EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 214 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 214 (2025) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2025
CIFEM’2024 - 4e édition du Colloque International sur la Formation et l’Enseignement des Mathématiques et des Sciences & Techniques
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521401004
Published online 28 March 2025
  1. S. Saleh, “Malaysian students’ motivation towards Physics learning,” Eur J Sci Math Educ, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 223–232, Oct. 2014, DOI: 10.30935/scimath/9414. [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Angell, Ø. Guttersrud, E. K. Henriksen, and A. Isnes, “Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching,” Sci Educ, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 683–706, Sep. 2004, DOI: 10.1002/sce.10141. [Google Scholar]
  3. H. D. Assem, L. Nartey, E. Appiah, and J. K. Aidoo, “A Review of Students’ Academic Performance in Physics: Attitude, Instructional Methods, Misconceptions and Teachers Qualification,” Eur J Educ Pedagog, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 84–92, 2023, DOI: 10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.551. [Google Scholar]
  4. U. AUGUSTINE OKORONKA and B. ZIRA WADA, “Effects of Analogy Instructional Strategy, Cognitive Style and Gender on Senior Secondary School Students Achievement in Some Physics Concepts in Mubi Metropolis, Nigeria,” Am J Educ Res, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 788–792, Sep. 2014, DOI: 10.12691/education-2-9-13. [Google Scholar]
  5. T. K. Debacker and R. M. Nelson, “Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability,” J Educ Res, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 245–254, 2000, DOI: 10.1080/00220670009598713. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Schleicher., “PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations,” 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA2018InsightsandInterpretationsFINALPDF.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. J. Banda and J. Nzabahimana, “The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulation-Based Learning on Motivation and Academic Achievement Among Malawian Physics Students,” J Sci Educ Technol, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 127–141, 2023, DOI: 10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Filgona, J. Sakiyo, D. M. Gwany, and A. U. Okoronka, “Motivation in Learning,” Asian J Educ Soc Stud, pp. 16–37, Sep. 2020, DOI: 10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273. [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Givens Rolland, “Synthesizing the Evidence on Classroom Goal Structures in Middle and Secondary Schools,” Rev Educ Res, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 396–435, Dec. 2012, DOI: 10.3102/0034654312464909. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Ben Ouahi, M. Ait Hou, A. Bliya, T. Hassouni, and E. M. Al Ibrahmi, “The Effect of Using Computer Simulation on Students’ Performance in Teaching and Learning Physics: Are There Any Gender and Area Gaps?,” Educ Res Int, vol. 2021, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2021, DOI: 10.1155/2021/6646017. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Hamamous and N. Benjelloun, “Influences of the effective use of a computer simulation on learning in physical science,” Int J Eval Res Educ, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 1591, Sep. 2023, DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24170. [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Taibu, Ll. Mataka, and V. Shekoyan, “Using PhET Simulations to Improve Scientific Skills and Attitudes of Community College Students,” Int J Educ Math Sci Technol, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 353–370, Apr. 2021, DOI: 10.46328/ijemst.1214. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Batamuliza, G. Habinshuti, and J. B. Nkurunziza, “Integration of Interactive Computer Simulations in Teaching and Learning Chemical Reaction: Students’ Performance and Concept Retention,” J Technol Sci Educ, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1060–1072, 2024, DOI: 10.3926/JOTSE.2682. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Ben Ouahi, M. Ait Hou, T. HassounI, and E. M. Al Ibrahimi, “Opinions of Moroccan teachers towards the use of PhET simulations in teaching and learning physics - chemistry,” in 2020 6th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt), Jul. 2020, pp. 274–278, DOI: 10.1109/CiSt49399.2021.9357174. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Ben Ouahi, D. Lamri, T. Hassouni, and E. M. Al Ibrahmi, “Science Teachers’ Views on the Use and Effectiveness of Interactive Simulations in Science Teaching and Learning,” Int J Instr, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 277–292, Jan. 2022, DOI: 10.29333/iji.2022.15116a. [Google Scholar]
  16. N. J. Ahmad, N. Yakob, M. A. H. Bunyamin, N. Winarno, and W. H. Akmal, “The Effect of Interactive Computer Animation and Simulation on Students’ Achievement and Motivation in Learning Electrochemistry,” J Pendidik IPA Indones, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311–324, Sep. 2021, DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v10i3.26013. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Haryadi and H. Pujiastuti, “PhET simulation software-based learning to improve science process skills,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 1521, no. 2, 2020, DOI: 10.1088/17426596/1521/2/022017. [Google Scholar]
  18. K. S. Taber, “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education,” Res Sci Educ, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1273–1296, Dec. 2018, DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. U. O. Eugene and D. N. Ezeh, “Influence of Gender and Location on Students’ Achievement in Chemical Bonding,” Mediterr J Soc Sci, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 309–318, 2016, DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n3p309. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. I. Oladejo, N. C. Nwaboku, P. A. Okebukola, and I. A. Ademola, “Gender difference in students’ performance in chemistry-can computer simulation bridge the gap?,” Res Sci Technol Educ, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1031–1050, 2023, DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2021.1981280. [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Sentongo, R. Kyakulaga, and I. Kibirige, “The Effect of Using Computer Simulations in Teaching Chemical Bonding: Experiences with Ugandan Learners,” Int J Educ Sci, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 433–441, Oct. 2013, DOI: 10.1080/09751122.2013.11890105. [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Radulović, V. Županec, M. Stojanović, and S. Budić, “Gender motivational gap and contribution of different teaching approaches to female students’ motivation to learn physics,” Sci Rep, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23151-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Patricia Murphy and Elizabeth Whitelegg, “Institude of physics report Girls in the Physics classroom: A Review of the Research on the Participation of Girls in Physics,” A Rev Res, no. Jun., 2006, [Online]. Available: https://www.iop.org/sites/default/files/2019-04/girls-in-the-physics-classroom.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Joshi and R. Srivastava, “Self-esteem and academic achievement of adolescents. [References] 1059,” J Indian Acad Appl Psychol, vol. 35, no. HOLDER: Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, pp. 33–39, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. E. C. Prima, A. R. Putri, and N. Rustaman, “Learning solar system using PhET simulation to improve students’ understanding and motivation,” J Sci Learn, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 60, 2018, DOI: 10.17509/jsl.v1i2.10239. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. M. Price, K. K. Perkins, N. G. Holmes, and C. E. Wieman, “How and why do high school teachers use PhET interactive simulations?,” Jan. 2019, DOI: 10.1119/perc.2018.pr.Price. [Google Scholar]
  27. S. L. Hannel and J. Cuevas, “A Study on Science Achievement and Motivation Using Computer-based Simulations Compared to Traditional Hands-on Manipulation,” Georg Educ Res, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2018, DOI: 10.20429/ger.2018.15103. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.