Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 222, 2025
2025 3rd International Conference on Education, Psychology and Cultural Communication (ICEPCC 2025)
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 9
Section Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation in Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522201010
Published online 17 September 2025
  1. E. R. Sykes, AI-assisted academic writing: A comparative study of student-crafted and ChatGPT-enhanced critiques in ubiquitous computing. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 15 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, F. Gouverneur, Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 16, 1 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  3. I. A. P. Wogu, S. Misra, E. F. Olu-Owolabi, et al., Artificial intelligence, artificial teachers and the fate of learners in the 21st century education sector: Implications for theory and practice. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 119, 2245 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Skulmowski, The cognitive architecture of digital externalization. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 35, 101 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Ofosu-Asare, Cognitive imperialism in artificial intelligence: counteracting bias with indigenous epistemologies. AI Soc. 1 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Creely, K. Janssen, Onto-epistemological understandings of generative artificial intelligence in education. Int. J. Chang. Educ. (2025). [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Wei, Cultivation of students’ critical thinking in the era of artificial intelligence–Based on the perspective of training mode and education subjects. In Appl. Intell. Syst. Multimodal Inf. Anal. 2, 786 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  8. V. E. S. Seaba, Revolutionizing education: Exploring the potential of AI-enabled brain-based learning for enhanced cognitive development. Open Access Libr. J. 10, 1 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  9. P. A. Facione, Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (California Academic Press, 1990). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. W. Paul, Critical and reflective thinking: A philosophical perspective. In Dimens. Think. Cogn. Instr. 445 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. A. J. Grondin, Effectiveness of the Socratic method: A comparative analysis of the historical and modern invocations of an educational method (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. K. R. Giva, S. E. Duma, Characteristics and critical success factors for implementing problem-based learning in a human resource-constrained country. Curationis 38, 1 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Jasin, H. T. Ng, I. Atmosukarto, et al., The implementation of chatbot-mediated immediacy for synchronous communication in an online chemistry course. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28, 10665 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Perla, V. Vinci, Enhancing authentic assessment in higher education: Leveraging digital transformation and artificial intelligence. AIxEDU 1 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Li, Multicultural data assistance mining analysis for ideological and political education in smart education platforms using artificial intelligence. Wirel. Netw. 31, 567 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Rauf, S. Nadeem, L. Tahir, Integrating artificial intelligence into curriculum design. Multidiscip. J. Emerg. Needs Curric. 1, 10 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Turilli, L. Floridi, The ethics of information transparency. Ethics Inf. Technol. 11, 105 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Ladson-Billings, Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. Am. Educ. Res. J. 32, 465 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Cui, N. A. B. A. Aziz, A. B. Hassan, Research on cross-cultural education communication platform based on artificial intelligence. In Proc. 2024 4th Int. Conf. Internet Technol. Educ. Informatization 265 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Li, J. Tong, Research on the problems and countermeasures of the imbalance of students’ subjective status in the age of artificial intelligence. Asia Pac. Econ. Manag. Rev. 1 (2024). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.