Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 235, 2026
2026 4th International Conference on Education, Psychology and Cultural Communication (ICEPCC 2026)
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 10
Section AI in Education and Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623504005
Published online 30 June 2026
  1. X. Gu, B.J. Ericson, AI literacy in K-12 and higher education in the wake of generative AI: An integrative review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00079 (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2503.00079 [Google Scholar]
  2. C.N. Prilop, D.-K. Mah, L.J. Jacobsen, R.R. Hansen, K.E. Weber, F. Hoya, Generative AI in teacher education: Educators’ perceptions of transformative potentials and the triadic nature of AI literacy explored through AI-enhanced methods. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 9, 100471 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100471 [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Sperling, C.-J. Stenberg, C. McGrath, A. Åkerfeldt, F. Heintz, L. Stenliden, In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Comput. Educ. Open 6, 100169 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169 [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Arksey, L. O’Malley, Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, 19–32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Mishra, M.J. Koehler, Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teach. Coll. Rec. 108, 1017–1054 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Tour, A. Zadorozhnyy, Conceptualizing and operationalizing prompt literacy for English language learners. J. Adolesc. Adult Lit. 69, e70020 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70020 [Google Scholar]
  7. L.S. Lo, The CLEAR path: A framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. J. Acad. Librariansh. 49, 102720 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720 [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Tripathi, S.R. Sharma, V. Singh, P. Bhargava, C. Raj, Teaching and learning with AI: a qualitative study on K-12 teachers’ use and engagement with artificial intelligence. Front. Educ. 10, 1651217 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1651217 [Google Scholar]
  9. A.J. Naatz, A. Ruppar, Special education teachers’ use of generative artificial intelligence (AI): An exploratory survey of frequency and factors influencing adoption. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 0, 01626434251379800 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434251379800 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Dou, K. Rim, Measuring Teachers’ AI literacy through ChatGPT prompt engineering. ATRAS J. 6, 64–75 (2025). https://doi.org/10.70091/Atras/vol06no02.4 [Google Scholar]
  11. B.L. Moorhouse, Y. Wan, C. Wu, L. Kohnke, T.Y. Ho, T. Kwong, Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence: An intervention study in an initial language teacher education course. System 125, 103399 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103399 [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Ning, W. Zhang, D. Yao, B. Fang, B. Xu, T.T. Wijaya, Development and validation of the artificial intelligence literacy scale for teachers (AILST). Educ. Inf. Technol. 30, 17769–17803 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13347-5 [Google Scholar]
  13. R.C. Davila-Moran, J.M. Sanchez Soto, H.E. Lopez Gomez, M. Silva Infantes, A. Arias Lizares, L.M. Huanca Rojas, S.J. Cama Flores, Brief prompt-engineering clinic substantially improves AI literacy and reduces technology anxiety in first-year teacher-education students: A Pre–Post Pilot Study. Educ. Sci. 15, 1010 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Arrington, D. McVey, J. Mativo, R.M. Pidaparti, Enhancing teacher effectiveness with AI based prompt engineering: A proof of concept. J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res. 26, 5–10 (2025). https://doi.org/10.63504/jstem.v26i2.2711 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.