Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 08003 | |
Number of page(s) | 11 | |
Section | Morphologie | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184608003 | |
Published online | 09 July 2018 |
Toile versus dictionnaires : Les nominalisations du français en-age et en-ment
1
UMR STL, CNRS & Université de Lille
2
UMR CLLE, CNRS & Université Jean Jaurès
3
UMR ATILF, CNRS & Université de Lorraine
Le présent travail porte sur les suffixations en -age et en-ment du français formant des nominalisations. Il a pour objectif de vérifier la validité des hypothèses auxquelles ces deux suffixations ont donné lieu, en les confrontant aux données relevées sur la Toile absentes des principaux dictionnaires de langue générale contemporains. À l’aide d’une étude en contexte à grande échelle, nous montrons que la distinction théorique opérée entre les deux procédésest loin d’être aussi nett qu’ attendu et que ces données plaident en faveur d’une perspective d’un traitement des suffixes -age et-ment relevant d’une même règle de construction de lexèmes.
Abstract
Web vs dictionaries. French nominalizations in -age and in-ment.. This article addresses French suffixations in-age and-ment that form nominalizations. Our aim is to test the hypotheses about these two rules, based on occurrences collected from the Web and not found in contemporary dictionaries. Through a wide-scale study, we show that the differences between the two rules are not as obvious as expected, and that this data pleads for a perspective in which both suffixes follow a single word formation rule.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.