Open Access
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 26, 2016
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2015 (ERPA 2015)
Article Number 01063
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 26 April 2016
  1. Ackerman, P. L., A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257, (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong, P., Allison, W., & Rounds, J., Development and initial validation of brief public domain RIASEC marker scales. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 287–299, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R., Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland’s occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 56, 45–74, (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dawis, R. V. & Lofquist, L. H., A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual-differences model and its applications. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press., (1984). [Google Scholar]
  5. Deng, C.P., Armstrong, P. I., & Rounds, J., The fit of Holland’s RIASEC modelto US occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 1–22, (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Furnham, A., Vocational preference and P-O fit: Reflections on Holland’s Theory of Vocational Choice. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(1), 5-30, (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Furr, R. M., Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology, London: SAGE Publications, (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldberg, L. R., A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  9. Hogan, R., & Blake, R., John Holland’s Vocational Typology and Personality Theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(1), August 1999, Pages 41–56, (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holland, J. L., A theory of occupational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 35–45, (1959). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holland, J. L., Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, (1973). [Google Scholar]
  12. Holland, J. L., Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, (1997). [Google Scholar]
  13. Hutchinson, T.P., Assessing the congruence of worker and workplace using the proximities of their RIASEC types. Australian Journal of Career Development, 23(3), 133–139, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Junk, K. E. E., Personality, interests, and self-efficacy: The incremental validity of basic level constructs in discriminating among college majors and occupational aspirations. Graduate These and Dissertations. Paper 12713, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  15. Kalleberg, A.L., Work Values and Job Rewards: A Theory of Job Satisfaction. American Sociological Review, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Feb., 1977), pp. 124–143, Stable URL:, (1977). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lent, R. W., Brown, S.D, & Hackett, G., Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122, (1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. McKay, D.A., & Tokar, D.M., The HEXACO and five-factor models of personality in relation to RIASEC vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 81, Issue 2, October 2012, Pages 138–149, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Noe, R. A., & Colquitt, J. A., Planning for training impact: Principles of training effectiveness. In Kraiger, K. (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development (pp. 53–79). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  19. Rounds, J., & Tracey, T. J., Cross-Cultural Structural Equivalence of RIASEC Models and Measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 310–329, (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schneider, B., The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–454, (1987). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schneider, B., Smith, D.B., Taylor, S., & Fleenor, J., Personality and organizations: A test of the homogeneity hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 462–470, (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sullivan, B. A., & Hansen, J. C., Mapping associations between interests and personality: Toward a conceptual understanding of individual differences in vocational behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 287–298, (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Swaney, K. B., Allen, J., Casillas, A., Hanson, M. A., Robbins, S. B., Interests, Work Values, and Occupations Predicting Work Outcomes With the Work Keys Fit Assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, November 2012 vol. 20 no. 4 359-374, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D., A Personality Trait-Based Interactionist Model of Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, Vol. 88, No. 3, 500–517, (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tracey, J.G.T., & Rounds, J., The Arbitrary Nature of Holland’s RIASEC Types: A Concentric-Circles Structure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 42, No: 4, 431–439, (1995). [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Putka, D. J., & Lanivich, S. E. (2011). Are You Interested? A Meta-Analysis of Relations Between Vocational Interests and Employee Performance and Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 6, 1167–1194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Walsh, W. B., Savickas, M. L., & Hartung, P. J. (2013). Handbook of Vocational Psychology: Theory, Research, and Practice. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  28. Leuty, M. E.; Hansen, J. C. (2013). Building Evidence of Validity: The Relation between Work Values, Interests, Personality, and Personal Values. Journal of Career Assessment, v21 n2 p175-189 May 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. McCloy, R., Waugh, G., Medsker, G., Wall, J., Rivkin, D., & Lewis, P. (1999) Development of the O*NET™ Paper-and-Pencil Work Importance Locator. National Center for O*NET Development, Employment Security Commission. [Google Scholar]
  30. O*NET Work Values source. Retrieved on May 19th 2015, [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.