Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 26, 2016
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2015 (ERPA 2015)
Article Number 01114
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601114
Published online 26 April 2016
  1. Asce, Menzel, K., Hartkopf, V., & Ilal, M., E. Collaborative Learning and Design in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction. In CINET2013 Conference Proceedings (pp. 309–337), (2013).
  2. BashierF. Reflections on architectural design education: The return of rationalism in the studio. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(4), 424–430. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.08.004. (2014). [CrossRef]
  3. EmbabyM. E. Heritage conservation and architectural education : “‘ An educational methodology for design studios .’” HBRC Journal, 10(3), 339–350. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.12.007, (2014). [CrossRef]
  4. HaddadR.Research and Methodology for Interior Designers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 283–291. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1343, (2014). [CrossRef]
  5. JamiesonP., FisherK., GildingT., TaylorP. G., & TrevittA. C. F. Place and Space in the Design of New Learning Environments. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 221–236. http://doi.org/10.1080/072943600445664, (2000). [CrossRef]
  6. LapadulaM. I., & QuirogaC. Heritage as a pedagogical resource and platform for exploration in architectural design education. The Journal of Architecture, 17(4), 591–607. http://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2012.709028, (2012). [CrossRef]
  7. McAllisterK. The design process-making it relevant for students. in design education: exploration and prospects for a better built enviroment. In: AshrafM., SalamaCrosbie, MichealJ. (Eds.), Archnet-IJAR, International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 4; 2010, pp. 76–89 (July and November 2010), 2010.
  8. PurcellA. T., & GeroJ. S. Drawings and the design process. Design Studies, 19(4), 389–430. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00015-5, (1998). [CrossRef]
  9. TzonisA. A framework for architectural education. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(4), 477–479. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.10.001, (2014). [CrossRef]
  10. YavuzA. Ö., & BülüçE. Proposing a Model Developed by Rule based Approaches in Architectural Design Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 334–338. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.415, (2014). [CrossRef]
  11. YazıcıoğluD. A. The Integration of Interior Architecture Education With Digital Design Approaches. Education, 8(5), 637–658, (2011).
  12. YildirimT., YavuzA. O., & KirciN. Experience of Traditional Teaching Methods in Architectural Design Education: “Mimesis Technique.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 234–238. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.151, (2012). [CrossRef]
  13. http://www.urbanrealm.com/blogs/index.php/2010/05/24/50494128-jpg?blog=12, 2015.
  14. http://drexel.edu/~/media/Images/westphal/dept/arch/slideshow/2014/DrexelArch_Context02.ashx?la=en&hash=25D541AB8705A185C06DFA7240CB96CCA3DCA50F, 2015.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.