Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 27, 2016
5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 08001
Number of page(s) 12
Section Morphologie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162708001
Published online 04 July 2016
  1. Ackerman, Farrell, James P Blevins & Robert Malouf. 2009. Parts and wholes : Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar : Form and acquisition, 54–82. Oxford Scholarship Online. [CrossRef]
  2. Albright, Adam. 2002. The identification of bases in morphological paradigms : UCLA dissertation.
  3. Albright, Adam & Bruce Hayes. 2003. Rules vs. analogy in english past tenses : A computational/experimental study. Cognition 90. 119–161. [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 62). Cambridge University Press.
  5. Arrivé, Michel. 1997. La conjugaison pour tous. Bescherelle. Hatier.
  6. Beniamine, Sarah & Benoît Sagot. 2015. Segmentation strategies for inflection class inference. In Décembrettes 9, Colloque international de morphologie, Toulouse, France : Université de Toulouse. https ://hal.inria.fr/hal-01190524.
  7. Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42. 531–573. [CrossRef]
  8. Bonami, Olivier & Sarah Beniamine. 2015. Implicative structure and joint predictiveness. In Vito Pirrelli, Claudia Marzi & Marcello Ferro (eds.), Word structure and word usage : Proceedings of the networds final conference,.
  9. Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé. 2014. De formes en thèmes. Foisonnements morphologiques. Etudes en hommage à Françoise Kerleroux 17–45.
  10. Bonami, Olivier & Ana R. Luís. 2014. Sur la morphologie implicative dans la conjugaison du portugais : une étude quantitative. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 22. 111–151.
  11. Brown, Dunstan & Andrew Hippisley. 2012. Network morphology : A defaults-based theory of word structure, vol. 133 Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef]
  12. de Calmès, Martine & Guy Pérennou. 1998. Bdlex : a lexicon for spoken and written french. In 1st international conference on language resources and evaluation, 1129–1136. Grenade : ELRA.
  13. Corbett, Greville G & Norman M Fraser. 1993. Network morphology : a datr account of russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics 29(01). 113–142. [CrossRef]
  14. Gaume, Bruno, Emmanuel Navarro, Yann Desalle & Benoît Gaillard. 2014. Mesurer la simi-larité structurelle entre réseaux lexicaux. In 21ème taln, 30–39.
  15. Kilani-Schoch, Marianne & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2005. Morphologie naturelle et flexion du verbe français. Tübingen : Gunter Narr Verlag.
  16. New, Boris, C. Pallier, L. Ferrand & R. Matos. 2001. Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet : Lexique. L’Année Psychologique 101. 447–462. [CrossRef]
  17. Shannon, Claude. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27. 379–423, 623–656. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  18. Stump, Gregory & Raphael AFinkel. 2013. Morphological typology: From word to paradigm, vol. 138. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef]
  19. Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.