Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 27, 2016
5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 12010
Number of page(s) 18
Section Sémantique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162712010
Published online 04 July 2016
  1. Benetti, L. (2008). L’article zéro en français contemporain : aspect syntaxique et sémantique. Bern : Peter Lang.
  2. Brisson, C. (2003). Plural, all, and the nonuniformity of collective predication. Linguistics & Philosophy, 26, 129-184. [CrossRef]
  3. Cadiot, P. (1997). Avec, ou le déploiement de l’éventail. In Guimier, C. (dir.). Cotexte et calcul du sens. Presses Universitaires de Caen, 135-155.
  4. Curat, H. (1999). Les déterminants dans la référence nominale et conditions de leur absence. Genève-Paris : Droz.
  5. Gary-Prieur, M.-N. (2011). Les déterminants du français. Paris : Orhrys.
  6. Hackl, M. (2002). The Ingredients of Essentially Plural Predicates. In Hirotani, M. (ed.). Proceedings of NELS, 32, 171-182.
  7. Haspelmath, M. (2007). Coordination. In Shopen, T. (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1-51. [CrossRef]
  8. Heycock, C. & Zamparelli, R. (2003). Coordinated Bare Definites. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 443-469. [CrossRef]
  9. Jayez, J. & Mari, A. (2005). Togetherness. In Maier E., Bary, C. & Huitink, J. (eds). Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 9, 155-169.
  10. Lambrecht, K. (1984). Formulaicity, Frame Semantics and Pragmatics in German Binominal Expressions. Language, 60.4, 753-796. [CrossRef]
  11. Lasersohn, P. (1998). Events in the Semantics of Collectivizing Adverbials. In Rothstein, S. (ed.) Events and Grammar. Dordrecht : Kluwer, 273-292. [CrossRef]
  12. Le Bruyn, B. & de Swart, H. (2014). Bare coordination: the semantic shift. Natural Languages & Linguistic Theory, 32, 1205-1246. [CrossRef]
  13. Mari, A. (2005a). Sous-spécification et interprétation contextuelle : le cas de avec. In Corblin, F. & Gardent, C. (éds.). Interpréter en Contexte. Lavoisier, 81-106.
  14. Mari, A. (2005b). Intensional epistemic wholes : A study in the ontology of collectivity. In Machery, E. & Werning, M. (eds.). The compositionality of Meaning and Context, Vol. 1 FoundationalIssues. Ontos Verlag, 189-212.
  15. Mari, A. (2012). A note on generic quantification and the ontology of twins and bikini. In Mari, A. (dir). Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 41, 147-162. [CrossRef]
  16. Märzhäuser, C. (2013). Coordinated bare nouns in French, Spanish and European Portuguese. In Kabatek, J. & Wall, A. (eds.). New Perspectives on Bare Noun Phrases in Romance and Beyond. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 283-300. [CrossRef]
  17. Märzhäuser, C. (2014). L’interfaces de la syntaxe dans l’analyse de la construction des noms nus coordonnés. SHS Web of Conferences 8, 4ème Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, 2501-2513, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20140801387
  18. McNally, L. (1993). Comitative coordination: a case study in group formation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 11, 347-379. [CrossRef]
  19. Michaux, C. (1998). Reducing the Coordination of Determiners: Some Principle. In Hamm, F. & Hinrichs, E. (eds.). Plurality and Quantification. Dordrecht : Kluwer, 321-337. [CrossRef]
  20. Milner, J.-C. (1979). De la syntaxe à l’interprétation. Paris: Seuil, 1979.
  21. Moltmann, F. (2004). The Semantics of Together. Natural Language Semantics, 12, 289-318. [CrossRef]
  22. Mulder, V. (2009). Les noms nus coordonnés : Les N et N du français. Mémoire de licence, l’Université de Utrecht. http://www.hum.uu.nl/medewerkers/b.s.w.lebruyn/weakreferentiality/files/Mulder_bachelor.pdf
  23. Riegel, M., Pellat, J.-C. & Rioul, M. (1999). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris : PUF.
  24. Roodenburg, J. (2004). French Bare Arguments Are Not Extinct: The Case of Coordinated Bare Nouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 301-313. [CrossRef]
  25. Roodenburg, J. (2005). Une coordination particulière : les syntagmes N Conj N en français. Langages, 160, 93-109. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.