Open Access
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 27, 2016
5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 14012
Number of page(s) 12
Section Syntaxe
Published online 04 July 2016
  1. Abeillé, A.; Clément, L.; Toussenel, F. (2003). Building a treebank for French. Dans Abeillé, A. Treebanks. Dordrecht : Kluwer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1980). Divers types de relatives en français parlé. TA Informations, 2, 16-25. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1990). Usages normatifs et non normatifs dans des relatives en français, espagnol, portugais. Bechert, J.; Bernini, G.; Buridant, C. Towards a typology of European languages, 317-333. Berlin : de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1995). De la rareté de certains phénomènes syntaxiques en français parlé. Journal of French Language Studies, 5(1), 17-29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Branca-Rosoff, S.; Fleury, S.; Lefeuvre, F.; Pires, M. (2012). Discours sur la ville. Présentation du Corpus de Français Parlé Parisien des années 2000 (CFPP2000). URL : [Google Scholar]
  6. Chaves, R. (2013). An expectation-based account of subject islands and parasitism. Journal of Linguistics, 49(2), 285-327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. Freidin, R.; Michaels, D.; Otero, C. P.; Zubizarreta, M. L. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory : Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133-165. Cambridge : MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Deane, P. (1991). Limits to Attention: A Cognitive Theory of Island Phenomena. Cognitive Linguistics, 2(1), 1-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Erteschick-Shir, N. (2007). Information Structure : The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford : Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fodor, J.; Sag, I. (1996). Une analyse sans catégorie vide des phénomènes d’extraction. Langages, 122, 8-31. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gapany, J. (2004). Formes et fonctions des relatives en français. Berne : Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gibson, T. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gibson, T. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Miyashita, Y. : Marantz, A.; O’Neil, W. Image, Language, Brain, p. 95-126. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Godard, D. (1988). La syntaxe des relatives en français. Paris : CNRS edition. [Google Scholar]
  15. Godard, D; Sag, I. (1996). Quels compléments de nom peut-on extraire en français ? Langages, 122, 60-79. [Google Scholar]
  16. Godard, D. (1992). Extraction out of NP in French, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 2, 232-277. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Laurens, F.; Bîlbîie, G. (2010). Towards a nonelliptical analysis of verbless relative adjuncts. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics (Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics), 1, 51-67. [Google Scholar]
  19. Legendre, G.; Sorace, A. (2003). Auxiliaires et intransitivité en français et dans les langues romanes. Godard, D. Les langues romanes, 185-233. Paris : CNRS Editions. [Google Scholar]
  20. Polinsky, M.; Gallo, C. G.; Graff, P.; Kravtchenko, E.; Milton Morgan, A.; Sturgeon, A. (2013). Chapter 13. Subject islands are different. Sprouse, J; Hornstein, N. Experimental Syntax and Island Effects. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pozniak, C.; Hemforth, B. (2015). Processing subject and object relative clauses in French and Mandarin Chinese. Poster à CUNY, Los Angeles. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ross, J. R. (1968). Constraints on variables in syntax. Indiana University Linguistics Club. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sabel, J. (2002). A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands. The Linguistic Review, 19, 271-315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sprouse, J.; Caponigro, I., Greco, C., Cechetto C. (2015). Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural language and linguistic theory 34(1), 307-344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.