EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 33 (2017) SHS Web Conf., 33 (2017) 00080 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 33, 2017
International Conference on Communication and Media: An International Communication Association Regional Conference (i-COME’16)
Article Number 00080
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173300080
Published online 02 February 2017
  1. Bakker, T. P., & Vreese, C. H. Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38, 451 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Theocharis, Y., & Quintelier, E. Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment? The effect of Facebook on adolescent participation. New Media & Society (2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. Howard, P. N., & Parks, M. R. Social media and political change: Capacity, constraint, and consequence. J. Commun., 62(2), 359–362 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Waller, L. G. SAGE Open, 3(2), (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. Dong, Q., Toney, J., & Giblin, P. Social network dependency and intended political participation. Human Communication, 13(1), 13–27,(2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. Olabamiji, O. M. Use and Misuse of the New Media for Political Communication in Nigeria’s 4th Republic. Developing Country Studies, 4(2), 44–53 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  7. Skoric, M. M., & Poor, N. Youth engagement in Singapore: The interplay of social and traditional media. J. Broadcast. Electron., 57(2), 187–204 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan, M., & Guo, J. The role of political efficacy on the relationship between Facebook use and participatory behaviors: A comparative study of young American and Chinese adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(6), 460–463 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. Hooghe, M., Hosch-Dayican, B., & van Deth, J. W. Conceptualizing political participation. Acta Politica, 49(3), 337–348 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Conroy, M., Feezell, J. T., & Guerrero, M. Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1535–1546 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Skoric, M. M., & Kwan, G. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 3(1), 70–79, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  12. Zúñiga, H. G. de, Jung, N.M, & ValenzuelaS. J Comput Mediat Commun, 17(3), 319–336 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cantijoch, M., Gibson, R. K., & Cutts, D. C. Engagement in the online campaign in the United States and France. A comparative analysis. EPSA 2013 Annual General Conference Paper, 323 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14 (3), 107–114 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Towner, T. L. All political participation is socially networked? New media and the 2012 election. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 527–541 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thun, V. Northern Illinois University (2014 to be published) [Google Scholar]
  17. Gromping, M. ‘Echo Chambers’ Partisan Facebook Groups during the 2014 Thai Election. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 24(1), 39–59, (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Muntean, A. Aarhus University, (2015 to be published) [Google Scholar]
  19. Ksiazek, T. B., Peer, L., & Lessard, K. User engagement with online news: Conceptualizing interactivity and exploring the relationship between online news videos and user comments. New Media & Society, 18(3), 502–520 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lahabou and Wok. (2011). Students’ acceptance of an internet campus radio: a test of the technology acceptance model. Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, 1–10 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  21. Tang, G., & Lee, F. L. F. Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., 31(6), 763–773 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Feezell, J. T., Conroy, M., & Guerrero, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  23. Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Jia, H., & Kim, H.-S. Theoretical importance of contingency in human-computer interaction effects of message interactivity on user engagement. Commun. Res., 1–31. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  24. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247–253 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Young, A. L., & Quan-Haase, A. Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites: a case study of facebook. C&T ‘09, 265–274 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin, L. C.-S. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 1–16. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  27. Moeller, J., de Vreese, C., Esser, F., & Kunz, R. Pathway to political participation: The influence of online and offline news media on internal efficacy and turnout of first-time voters. Am. Behav. Sci., 58(5), 689–700 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vissers, S., Hooghe, M., Stolle, D., & Maheo, V. –a. The impact of mobilization media on off-line and online participation: Are mobilization effects mediumspecific?. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., 30(2), 152–169 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yamamoto, M., & Kushin, M. J. J Comput Mediat Commun, 19, 3 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang, H. C., & DeHart, J. L. Social Media + Society, 2(1), 1–18. (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Himelboim, I., Mccreery, S., & Smith, M. J Comput Mediat Commun, 18, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  32. National Bureau of Statistics Nigeria, 2012. Retrieved from www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/pages/download/121 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jung, N., Kim, Y., & de Zúñiga, H. G. The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407–430 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ellison, N. B., Steinfeld, C., & Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, S., & Cho, M. Social Media Use in a Mobile Broadband Environment. Examination of Determinants of Twitter and Facebook Use. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 6(2), 71–78 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  36. Lim, J. (2012 Doctoral dissertation, Brunel University Brunel Business School PhD Theses). [Google Scholar]
  37. Whiteley, P. Citizenship Education : The Political Science Perspective. (2005) [Google Scholar]
  38. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S., Applied multiple regression/correlation Analysis for the behavioural sciences, Mahwah, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey 2003) [Google Scholar]
  39. Mohamad, B., Bakar, H. A., & Rahman, N. A. A. Relationship between corporate identity and corporate reputation: a case of a Malaysian higher education sector. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 2(2), 81–89 (2007) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.