Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 37, 2017
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2017 (ERPA 2017)
Article Number 01063
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 14 August 2017
  1. Klopfer, E., Squire, K. Environmental Detectives - The Development Of An Augmented Reality Platform For Environmental Simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development. April 2008, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 203–228. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D. Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics. Volume 27, Issue 3, June 2003, Pages 339–345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D., Wagner, M. Construct 3D: A Virtual Reality Application for Mathematics and Geometry Education. Education and Information Technologies. December 2000, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 263–276. [Google Scholar]
  4. Abersek, B., Abersek, M. K., Technologia Vzdelavania “Role Of Teacher and/or Technology In The Education Process”; Nitra 20.6 (2012): 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bassett, L. W., Squire, L. F. (1985). Anatomy instruction by radiologists. Invest Radiol 20:1008–1010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benninger, B., Matsler, N., Delamarter, T. (2014). Classic versus millennial medical lab anatomy. Clin Anat 27:988–993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Craig, S., Tait, N., Boer, D., McAndrew, D. (2010). Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg 80:212–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drake, R. L., Pawlina, W. (2014). Multimodal education in anatomy: the perfect opportunity. Anat Sci Ed 7:1–2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grignon, B., Oldrini, G., Walter, F. Teaching medical anatomy: what is the role of imaging today? Surg Radiol Anat (2016) 38: 253–260 DOI 10.1007/s00276-015-1548-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ganske, I., Su, T., Loukas, M., Shaffer, K. (2006). Teaching methods in anatomy courses in North American medical schools: the role of radiology. Acad Radiol 13:1038–1046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Granger, NA, Calleson, DC, Henson, OW, Juliano, E, Wineski, L, McDaniel, MD, Burgoon, JM (2006) Use of web-based materials to enhance anatomy instruction in the health sciences. Anat Rec B New Anat 289:121–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mena, G., Llupià, A., García-Basteiro, A. L., Sequera, V. G., Aldea, M., Bayas, J. M. and Trilla, A. Educating on professional habits: attitudes of medical students towards diverse strategies for promoting influenza vaccination and factors associated with the intention to get vaccinated” BMC Medical Education. 2013 13:99. 18 July 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hege, I., Radon, K., Dugas, M., Scharrer, E., Nowak, D. “Web-based training in occupational medicine. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health; Heidelberg 76.1 (Jan 2003): 50–4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jack, A., Burbridge, B. (2012). The Utilisation of radiology for the teaching of anatomy in Canadian medical schools. Can Assoc Radiol J 63:160–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Aoki, K., Downes, E. J. An analysis of young peoples use of and attitudes toward cell phones. Telematics and Informatics 20 (2003) 349–364. 27.05.2017 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır. [Google Scholar]
  16. Aydoğdu Karaaslan, İ., Budak, L. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Cep Telefonu Özelliklerini Kullanımlarının ve Gündelik İletişimlerine Etkisinin Araştırılması. Journal of Yasar University 2012 26(7) 4548–4525. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuronen, R., Jallinoja, P., Airola, R., Patja, K. Educational implementation programme of guidelines on cardiovascular risk factors: an analysis of changes in familiarity, use and attitudes. Primary Health Care Research & Development; Cambridge 11.3 (Jul 2010): 241–249. [Google Scholar]
  18. Maleck, M., Fischer, M., Kammer, B., Zeiler, C., Mangel, E., Schenk, F., Pfeifer, K. J. (2001). Do computers teach better? A media comparison study for case-based teaching in radiology. Radiographics 21:1025–1032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kish, G., Cook, S. A., Kis, G. (2013). Computer-assisted learning in anatomy at the international medical school in Debrecen, Hungary: a preliminary report. Anat Sci Educ 6:42–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Korner, N. (1973). Diagnostic radiology in the medical curriculum. Med J Aust 24:605–611. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mitchell, B. S., William, J. E. (2002). Trends in radiological anatomy teaching in the U.K. and Ireland. Clin Radiol 57:1070–1072. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rakel, D. P., Hedgecock, J. Healing the healer: a tool to encourage student reflection towards health. Med Teach 2008, 30:633–635. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Phillips, A. W., Smit, S., Straus, C. M. (2013). The role of radiology in preclinical anatomy: a critical review of the past, present, and future. Acad Radiol 20:297–304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shaffer, K., Small, J. E. (2004). Blended learning in medical education: use of an integrated approach with web-based small group modules and didactic instruction for teaching radiologic anatomy. Acad Radiol 11:1059–1070. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. McNulty, J. A., Halama, J., Espiritu, B. (2004). Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in the medical gross anatomy curriculum. Clin Anat 17:73–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Phillips, G. S., LoGerfo, S. E., Richardson, M. L., Anzai, Y. (2012). Interactive webbased learning module on CT of the temporal bone: anatomy and pathology. Radiographics 32:E85–E105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tam, M. D., Hart, A. R., Williams, S. M., Holland, R., Heylings, D., Leinster, S. (2010). Evaluation of a computer program (‘disect’) to consolidate anatomy knowledge: a randomised-controlled trial. Med Teach 32:e138–e142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson Jr, T. H. (1969). Medical school radiology teaching and examination methods. Radiology 93:443–446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., Mitchell, R. Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology. February 2009, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 7–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.