Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 38, 2017
Connaissances et Usages en L2 / Knowledge and Usage in L2
Article Number 00010
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173800010
Published online 01 December 2017
  1. Abdelli-Beruh, N. B. (2004). The Stop Voicing Contrast in French Sentences: Contextual Sensitivity of Vowel Duration, Closure Duration, Voice Onset Time, Stop Release and Closure Voicing. Phonetica, 61, 201–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, J.R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andringa, S. & Rebuschat, P. (2015). New directions in the study of implicit and explicit learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 185-196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Auzou, P., Özsancak, C., Morris, R., Jan, M., Eustache, F., & Hannequin, D. (2000). Voice onset time in aphasia, apraxia of speech and dysarthria: a review. Clinical linguistics and phnetics, 14(2), 131-150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2005). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn. O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (eds.), Language experience in second language learning: In honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 13-34 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.19, retrieved 13 June 2016 from http://www.praat.org/ [Google Scholar]
  7. Braun, A. (1996). Zur regionalen Distribution von VOT im Deutschen. In Braun, A. (ed.), Untersuchungen zu Stimme und Sprache. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. 19-32. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT : evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 207-229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 195-221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. DeKeyser R. (ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Di Cristo, Albert (1998). Intonation in French. In Di Cristo, A. & Hirst, D. (eds.) Intonation systems: a survey of twenty languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195-218. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, N.C. (2005). At the interface. Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis, N.C. (2008). Implicit and explicit knowledge about language. In Cenoz, J., & Hornberger, N. H. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd edition, Volume 6: Knowledge about Language. New York : Springer. 119-132. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, A.W., & Young, A.W. (1988). Human Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1972). ‘p t k’ et ‘b d g’ français en position intervocalique accentuée. In Valdman, A. (ed.), Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre. The Hague: Mouton. 143-200. [Google Scholar]
  17. Flege, J.E. (1988). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 70-79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Flege, J.E., & Hammond, R. (1982). Non-distinctive phonetic differences between language varieties. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 1-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2014). Incidental exposure and L3 learning of morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 1-34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Han, Z.-H., & Finneran, R. (2014). Re-engaging the interface debate: Strong, weak, none, or all? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 370-389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18(3), 193-223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hulstijn, J. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of of implicit and explicit second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129-140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jessen, M. (1998). Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jessen, M., & Ringen, C. (2002). Laryngeal features in German. Phonology, 19, 189-218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Klatt, D. (1975). Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 686-706. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Künzel, H.J. (1987), Sprecherkennung. Grundzüge forensischer Sprachverarbeitung. Heidelberg: Kriminalistik Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jessen, M. (1998). Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  28. Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. C., & Cooper, F. S. (1958). Some cues for the distinction between voiced and voiceless stops in initial position. Language and Speech, 1, 153-167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10, 1-28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mora, J., Rochdi, Y., & Kvistö-de Souza, H. (2014). Mimicking accented speech as L2 phonological awareness. Language Awareness, 23, 57-75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nearey, T. M., & Rochet, B. (1994). Effects of Place of Articulation and Vowel Context on VOT Production and Perception for French and English Stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 24, 1-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Neuhauser, S. (2008). Voice disguise using a foreign accent – phonetic and linguistic variation. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 15, (2), 131–159. [Google Scholar]
  34. Neuhauser, S. (2012). Phonetische und linguistische Aspekte der Akzentimitation im forensischen Kontext. Produktion und Perzeption. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 132-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ohala, J. (1981). Articulatory constraints on the cognitive representation of speech. In Myers, T., Laver. J. & Anderson, J. (eds), The Cognitive Representation of Speech. Amsterdam: North Holland. 111-122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 317-327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63 (3), 595-626. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Riney, T. J., & Takagi, N. (1999). Global foreign accent and voice onset time among Japanese EFL speakers. Language Learning, 49 (2), 275-302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Weber, A. & Cutler, A. (2006). First-language phonotactics in second-language listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119 (1), 597-607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.