Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 38, 2017
Connaissances et Usages en L2 / Knowledge and Usage in L2
Article Number 00011
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173800011
Published online 01 December 2017
  1. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59 (2), 249-306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asher, J. J., & Garcia, R. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 311, 334-341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). “Praat: doing phonetics by computer.” Version 6.0. Retrieved from www.praat.org. [Google Scholar]
  4. Borovičková, B., & Maláč, V. (1967). The spectral analysis of Czech sound combinations. Praha : Academia. [Google Scholar]
  5. Catford, J. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1970). Auditory vs Articulatory Training in Exotic Sounds. The Modern Language Journal, 54, 477-481. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dankovicova, J. (1997). Czech. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 27, 77-80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Delattre, P., Liberman, A. M., & Cooper, F. S. (1951). Voyelles synthétiques à deux formants et voyelles cardinales. Le Maître Phonétique, 96, 30-36. [Google Scholar]
  8. Delattre, P. (1960). Sommes-nous préparés pour l'enseignement de la langue? The French Review, 33 (5), 483-490. [Google Scholar]
  9. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based Perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Escudero, P. (2001). The role of the input in the development of L1 and L2 sound contrasts: language-specific cue weighting for vowels. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Cascadilla. [Google Scholar]
  11. Flanagan, J. L. (1955). A Difference Limen for Vowel Formant Frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27 (613), 613-617. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Flege, J. E. (1987). A Critical Period for Learning to Pronounce Foreign Languages ? Applied Linguistics, 8, 162-177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second Language Speech Learning. Theory, Findings, and Problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience : Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-Language Speech Research: Timonium, MD : York Press Inc. [Google Scholar]
  14. Flege, J. E. (2007). Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. In J. Cole & J. I. Hualde (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 353-380. [Google Scholar]
  15. Flege, J. E. (2016). The role of phonetic category formation in second language speech acquisition. Présenté à New Sounds, Aarhus, Denmark, June 2016. [Google Scholar]
  16. Galazzi-Matasci, E., & Pedoya, E. (1983). Et la pédagogie de la prononciation. Le Français dans le Monde, 180, 39-44. [Google Scholar]
  17. Georgeton, L., Paillereau, N., Landron, S., Gao, J., & Kamiyama, T. (2012). Analyse formantique des voyelles orales du français en contexte isolé : à la recherche d’une référence pour les apprenants de FLE. Actes des Journées d’Etude sur la Parole, Grenoble . [Google Scholar]
  18. Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. S. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception : the case of Japonese adult's perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107 (5), 2711-2724. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hála, B. (1941). Akustická podstata samohlásek. Praha: Česká akademie věd a umění. [Google Scholar]
  20. Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2001). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Speech, Hearing and Language: work in progress, 13, B48-B57. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuhl, P. K. (1992). Speech prototypes: Studies on the nature, functions, ontogeny and phylogeny of the «centers of speech categories». In L. A. Werner & E. W. Rubel (Eds.), Developmental psychoacoustics. Washington: American Psychological Association, 293-332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [Google Scholar]
  23. Landercy, A., & Renard, R. (1976). Observations sur les fondements acoustiques et perceptifs de certains procédés du système verbo-tonal. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 19-40, 175-194. [Google Scholar]
  24. Landron, S., Paillereau, N., Nawafleh, A., Exare, C., Ando, H., & Gao, J. (2010). Le corpus PhoDiFLE : un corpus commun de français langue étrangère pour une étude phonétique des productions de locuteurs de langues maternelles plurielles. Cahiers de Praxématique, 54-55, 73-86. [Google Scholar]
  25. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Classroom-oriented research from a complex systems perspective. Presentation orale au colloque “Classroom-oriented research: Towards effective learning and teaching”, Konin, Pologne, octobre 2015. [Google Scholar]
  26. Leather, J. (1983). Second-language pronounciation learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 16 (3), 198-219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  28. Oyama, S. (1976). A Sensitive Period for the Acquisition of a Nonnative Phonological System. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5 (3), 261–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paillereau, N. (2015). Assessing the phonetic level in L2 vowels production with the VisuVo software: Case of Czech learners acquiring contrasts between French mid vowels e/ε, ϕ/œ and o/ɔ Actes de PTLC, UCL, London. [Google Scholar]
  30. Paillereau, N. (2016). ‘Identical’ vowels in L1 and L2? Criteria and implications for L2 phonetic teaching and learning. In Liszka, S. A., Leclercq, P., Tellier, M. and Véronique, G. D. (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 2016. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 144–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Paillereau, N. & Skarnitzl, R. (soumis). An acoustic-perceptual study on Czech monophthongs. In Kosta, P. & Radeva-Bork, T. (eds), Current developments in Slavic Linguistics. Twenty years after. Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  32. Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: a review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191-215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Polivanov, E. (1931). The perception of non-native language sounds. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 4, 79-96. [Google Scholar]
  34. Schwartz, J.-L., Abry, C., Boë, L.-J., Ménard, L., & Vallé, N. (2005). Asymmetries in vowel perception, in the context of the Dispersion–Focalisation Theory. Speech Communication, 45, 425-434. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Skarnitzl, R. et Volín, J. (2012). Reference values of vowel formants for young adult speakers of Standard Czech. Akustické listy, 18, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  36. Scovel, T. (1978). The Effect of Affect on Foreign Language Learning : A Review of the Anxiety Research. Language Learning, 28, 129-141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tahta, S., Wood, M., & Leowenthal, K. (1981). Foreign Accents : Factors Relating to Transfer of Accent from the first Language to a Second Language. Language and Speech, 24 (3), 265-272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Taylor, L. L., Catford, J. C., Guiora, A. Z., & Lane, H. (1971). Psychological Variables and Ability to Pronounce a Second Language. Language and Speech, 14 (2), 146-157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Troubetzkoy, N. S. (1957). Principes de phonologie. Paris: Klincksieck. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vaissière, J. (2006). La phonétique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wachs, S. (2011). Tendances actuelles en enseignement de la prononciation du français, langue étrangère (FLE). Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 14, 183-196. [Google Scholar]
  42. Werker, J. F., & Lalonde, C. E. (1988). Cross-Language Speech Perception: Initial Capabilites and Developmental Change. Developmental Psychology, 24 (5), 672-683. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wioland, F. (2005). La vie sociale des sons du français. Paris: L'Harmattan. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.