Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 38, 2017
Connaissances et Usages en L2 / Knowledge and Usage in L2
Article Number 00012
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 01 December 2017
  1. Best, C. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 171–206). Timonium: York Press.
  2. Bigi, B., & Hirst, D. (2012). SPeech Phonetization Alignment and Syllabification (SPPAS): A tool for the automatic analysis of speech prosody. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody (Sp2012), 19–22.
  3. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  4. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
  5. Corder, S. (1967). The Significance of Learner’s Errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–170. [CrossRef]
  6. Corder, S. (1992). A Role for the Mother Tongue. In S. M. Gass & L. Selinker, (Eds.), Language Transfer in Language Learning (Vol. 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 18-31 [CrossRef]
  7. Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef]
  8. Delais-Roussarie, E., Post, B., Avanzi, M., Buthke, C., Di Cristo, A., Feldhausen, I., Yoo, H.-Y. (2015). Intonational Phonology of French: developing a ToBI system for French. In S. Frota & P. Prieto (Eds.), Intonational variation in Romance (pp. 63–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef]
  9. Delattre, P. (1966). Les dix intonations de base du français. The French Review, 40(1), 1–14.
  10. Di Cristo, A. (2013). La prosodie de la parole. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
  11. Flege, J. E., & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 708–721. [CrossRef]
  12. Hirst, D. (2007). A Praat plugin for MOMEL and INTSINT with improved algorithms for modelling and coding intonation. ICPhS 2007. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1233–1236.
  13. Hirst, D. (2012). ProZed: A speech prosody analysis-by-synthesis tool for linguists. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody (Sp2012, 15-18.
  14. Hirst, D., & Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Horgues, C. (2010). Prosodie de l’accent français en anglais et perception par des auditeurs anglophones. Thèse de doctorat. Universite Paris 7.
  16. Hualde, J., & Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In P. Prieto & S. Frota (Eds.), Intonational variation in Romance (pp. 350–391). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef]
  17. Jilka, M. (2000). The contribution of intonation to the perception of foreign accent. Thèse de doctorat. Universität Stuttgart.
  18. Kuhl, P., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the “Perceptual Magnet Effect.” In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 121–154). Timonium: York Press.
  19. Lepetit, D. (1992). Intonation française, enseignement et apprentissage. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
  20. Origlia, A., & Alfano, I. (2012). Prosomarker: a prosodic analysis tool based on optimal pitch stylization and automatic syllabification. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC ’12), 997–1002.
  21. Ortiz Lira, H., Fuentes, M., & Astruc, L. (2010). Chilean Spanish Intonation. In P. Prieto & P. Roseano (Eds.), Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language (pp. 255–283). Munich: Lincom Europa.
  22. Prieto, P., Roseano, P., & Borràs-Comes, J. (2010). Interactive Atlas of Romance Intonation.
  23. Rognoni, L. (2012). The impact of prosody in foreign accent detection. A perception study of Italian accent in English. Methodological Perspectives on Second Language Prosody ML2P, 89–93.
  24. Rognoni, L., & Busà, M. G. (2014). Testing the Effects of Segmental and Suprasegmental Phonetic Cues in Foreign Accent Rating : An Experiment Using Prosody Transplantation. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 547–560.
  25. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 209–231. [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, Y., & Xu, C. X. (2005). Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics, 33(2), 159–197. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.