Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 48, 2018
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2018 (ERPA 2018)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 15 August 2018
  1. Bayraktar, F. Online Risks and Parental Mediation Strategies Comparison of Turkish Children/Adolescents Who Live In Turkey and Europe. TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM. doi:10.15390/eb.2017.6323, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis, V. Interconnected But Underprotected? Parents’ Methods and Motivations for Information Seeking on Digital Safety Issues. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 15(12), 669-674. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0179, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Del Rey, R., Casas, J. A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P., ... Plichta, P. Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 141-147. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.065, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frania, M. Selected aspects of media literacy and new technologies in education as a challenge of Polish reality. Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business, 14(2), 109-112. doi:10.15208/pieb.2014.13, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. García-Lozano, C., Las-Heras-Casas, J., Fraile-García, E., & Ferreiro-Cabello, J. DIDACTIC STRATEGIES TO DEVELOP KEY COMPETENCIES. INTED2016 Proceedings. doi:10.21125/inted.2016.0958, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. Hannaford, J., & Beavis, C. When will the Internet be connected? Digital worlds and belonging in the lives of globally mobile children. Literacy, 52(1), 47-54. doi:10.1111/lit.12123, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harrison, E., & McTavish, M. ‘i’Babies: Infants’ and toddlers’ emergent language and literacy in a digital culture of iDevices. Journal Of Early Childhood Literacy, 18(2), 163-188. doi:10.1177/1468798416653175, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kopecký, K. Sexting Among Slovak Pubescents and Adolescent Children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 203, 244-250. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.289, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mackowicz, J., & Wnek-Gozdek, J. “It’s never too late to learn”-How does the Polish U3A change the quality of life for seniors? Educational Gerontology, 42(3), 186-197. doi:10.1080/03601277.2015.1085789, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marsh, J., Hannon, P., Lewis, M., & Ritchie, L. Young Children’s Initiation into Family Literacy Practices in the Digital Age. Journal Of Early Childhood Research, 15(1), 47-60, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Plichta, P., & Pyżalski, J. Narażenie uczniów ze specjalnymi potrzebami edukacyjnymi na hazard tradycyjny i internetowy oraz inne zachowania ryzykowne. Niepełnosprawność. doi:10.4467/, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., van Oosten, J. M., & Igartua, J. A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers In Human Behavior, 82186-198. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Siegle, D. Cyberbullying and Sexting: Technology Abuses of the 21st Century. Gifted Child Today, 33(2), 14-16, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Szotkowski, R. Dangerous behavior of children and youth in the internet and possibility of their protection. Journal of Technology and Information, 2(1), 110-114. doi:10.5507/jtie.2010.024, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tomczyk, Ł., & Selmanagic-Lizde, E. Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) among youth in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Scale and selected mechanisms. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 541-549. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.048, (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tomczyk, Ł., Srokowski, Ł., Wąsiński, A. Kompetencje w zakresie bezpieczeństwa cyfrowego w polskiej szkole. Tarnów: Stowarzyszenie Miasta w Internecie, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  17. Veteska, J. Uvod do teorie zdelavani dospelych a andragogiky. Usti nad Labeb: Univerzita J. Purkyne, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. Walotek-Ściańska, K. Persuasion strategies in Polish advertisements addressed to young people. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas Zarządzanie, 18(1), 0-0. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0010.2886, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, X., & Xing, W. Exploring the Influence of Parental Involvement and Socioeconomic Status on Teen Digital Citizenship: A Path Modeling Approach. Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 186-199, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  20. Wurtele, S. K., & Kenny, M. C. Technology-Related Sexual Solicitation of Adolescents: A Review of Prevention Efforts. Child Abuse Review, 25(5), 332-344. doi:10.1002/car.2445, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ziemba, E. Factors Affecting the Adoption and Usage of ICTs within Polish Households. Proceedings of the 2016 InSITE Conference. doi:10.28945/3508, (2016). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.