Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 48, 2018
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2018 (ERPA 2018)
Article Number 01021
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184801021
Published online 15 August 2018
  1. Novak, J. & Cañas, A.J. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-1. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pensacola, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  2. Novak J. D. Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(3), 21-30, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. Taber, K. S., & Coll, R. K. Chemical bonding. In J. K. Gilbert, O. de Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical Education: Research-based Practice (pp. 213-234). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers BV., (2002). [Google Scholar]
  4. Jonassen, D. H. Assessing cognitive structure: Verifying a method using pattern notes. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(3), 1-14, (1987). [Google Scholar]
  5. Ifenthaler D., Masduki I. & Seel N. M., The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Instructional Science, 39(1), 41-61, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Özdemir, B. Küresel kirlenme, sürdürülebilir ekonomik büyüme ve çevre vergileri. Maliye Dergisi, 156, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang, C-Y., Yeh, T-K., & Barufaldi, J. P. The positive and negative effects of science concept tests on student conceptual understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 265-282, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Oskay, Ö. Ö., Temel, S., Özgür, S. D., & Erdem, E. Determination of preservice chemistry teachers’ cognitive structures via flow map method and their knowledge level on “greenhouse gases and their effects” topic. Eurasian Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 4(1), 30-45, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  9. Selvi, M., & Yakışan, M. Akış haritaları yoluyla öǧrencilerin bilişsel yapılarının belirlenmesi: Ekolojik döngüler. Türk Fen Eǧitimi Dergisi, 2(1), 46-55, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  10. Akkutay, E. A. Yükseköǧrenimde küreselleşme ve yansımaları. Eǧitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi/JRES, 4(1), 1-16, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. Daǧlı, A. Küreselleşme karşısında Türk eǧitim sistemi. D. Ü. Ziya Gökalp Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 1-13, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  12. Eser, E. Küreselleşme süreci ve eǧitime etkisi. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), (2014). [Google Scholar]
  13. Korkmaz, M. Küreselleşen dünyada eǧitimin küreselleşmesi. Ar&Ge Bülten, Temmuz-Aǧustos, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  14. Gürbüz, Z. Sosyal bilgiler öǧretmen adaylarının küreselleşmeye yönelik görüşleri. Yüksel lisans tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Eǧitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. Fidan, S. (2011). Küreselleşme Surecinde Türkiye’de Gençliǧin Kimlik Algısı (Üniversite Gençliǧi Üzerine Bir Araştırma). Doktora Tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaya, P. Türkiye’de Küreselleşme Tartışmaları. Ankara Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  17. Vulliamy, G. Educational Reform in a Globalised Age: What is globalisation and how is it affecting Education world-wide? 5. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  18. Burbules, N., & Torres, C. (Eds.). Globalization and education: Critical perspectives. New York: Routledge, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  19. Carnoy, M. & Rhoten, D. What does globalization mean for educational change? A comparative approach. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 1-9, (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  21. Patton, M. Q. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  22. Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. Qualitative data analysis: An extended sourcebook. (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, England, (1994). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.