Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 78, 2020
7e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 14003
Number of page(s) 14
Section Syntaxe
Published online 04 September 2020
  1. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouchard, D. (1982). On the Content of Empty Categories. Dordrecht: Foris. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouchard, D. (1983). The Avoid Pronoun Principle and the Elsewhere Principle. In: Sells, P. & C. Jones (eds.), Proceedings of ALNE 13/NELS 13. Amherst (Mass.): GLSA, pp. 29-36. [Google Scholar]
  4. Costantini, F. (2005). On Obviation in Subjunctive Clauses: The State of the Art. Annali Di Ca’Foscari. Università di Venezia xliv(1-2): 97–132. [Google Scholar]
  5. Costantini, F. (2009). Interface Perspectives on Clausal Complementation. The Case of Subjunctive Obviation. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina. [Google Scholar]
  6. Costantini, F. (2013). Evidence for the competition-based analysis of subjunctive obviation from relative and adverbial clauses in Italian. In: Baauw, S., F. Drijkoningen, L. Meroni & M. Pinto (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Utrecht 2011. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 75-92. [Google Scholar]
  7. Costantini, F. (2016). Subject Obviation as a Semantic Failure: a Preliminary Account. Annali di Ca’ Foscari 50: 109–131. [Google Scholar]
  8. De Mulder, W. (2010). Mood in French. In: Rothstein, B. & R. Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the Languages of Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 157–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Farkas, D. (1992). On Obviation. In: Sag, I. & A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 85–109. [Google Scholar]
  10. Featherston, S. (2006). Experimentell erhobene Grammatikalitätsurteile und ihre Bedeutung für die Syntaxtheorie. In: Kallmeyer W. & G. Zifonun (eds.), Sprachkorpora - Datenmengen und Erkenntnisfortschritt. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 49–69. [Google Scholar]
  11. Feldhausen, I. (2007). The Relation of Obviation and Control: Subjunctives and Infinitives in Spanish. Ms., ZAS Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  12. Feldhausen, I. (2010). Sentential Form and Prosodic Structure of Catalan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kempchinsky, P. (1987). The Subjunctive Disjoint Reference Effect. In: Neidle, C. & R. Nunez Cedeno (eds.), Studies in Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 123–140. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kempchinsky, P. (2009). What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua 119(12): 1788–1810. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Le Goffic, P. (1993). Grammaire de la Phrase Française. Paris: Hachette Supérieur. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lujan, M. (1999). A Unified Approach to Control and Obviation. In: Franco, J., A. Landa & J. Martín (eds.), Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.105–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Manzini, M. (2000). Sentential Complementation. The Subjunctive. In: Coopmans, P., M. Everaert & J. Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical Specification and Insertion. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, pp. 241–268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mosegaard Hansen, M. (2016). The Structure of Modern Standard French: A Student Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  19. Picallo, C. (1985). Opaque domains. Ph.D. Thesis, CUNY. [Google Scholar]
  20. Poplack, S. (1992). The inherent variability of the French subjunctive. In: Laeufer, C. & T. Morgan (eds.), Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics, 235–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  21. Quer, J. (2006). Subjunctives. In: Everaert, M. & H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Syntax Companion, vol. IV. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 660–684. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Quer, J. (2017). Subjunctives. In: Everaert, M. & H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell ( .wbsyncom113). [Google Scholar]
  23. Raposo, E. (1985). Some Asymmetries in the Binding Theory in Romance. The Linguistic Review 5: 75–110. [Google Scholar]
  24. Riegel, M., J.-C. Pellat & R. Rioul (20145). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rizzi, L. (1991). On the anaphor-agreement effect. In: Rizzi, L. (ed.), Comparative Syntax and Language Acquisition. London/New York: Routledge, pp. 158–173. [Google Scholar]
  26. Romero Mérida, R. (2013). Processing Obviation in Spanish. Master‘s Thesis, University of Utrecht, <>. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ruwet, N. (1991). Je veux partir/*Je veux que je parte: on the distribution of finite complements and infinitival complements in French. In: Ruwet, N. (1991). Syntax and Human Experience. The University of Chicago Press. [publié avant dans: Cahiers de Grammaire 7 (1984), p.75–138 [Google Scholar]
  28. Schlenker, P. (2005). The Lazy Frenchman’s Approach to the Subjunctive. In: Geerts, T., I. van Ginneken & H. Jacobs (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 269-309. [Google Scholar]
  29. Schütze, C. & J. Sprouse. (2013). Judgment data. In: Podesva, R. & D. Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–50. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sprouse, J. (2018). Acceptability judgments and grammatically, prospects and challenges. In: Hornstein, N., H. Lasnik, P. Patel-Grosz & C. Yang (eds.), Syntactic Structures after 60 Years - The Impact of the Chomskyan Revolution in Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 195-224. [Google Scholar]
  31. Suner, M. (1986). On the Referential Properties of Embedded Finite Clause Subjects. In: Bordelois, I., H. Contreras & K. Zagona (eds.), Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 183–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Szucsich, L. (2009). Obviation und temporale Abhängigkeit bei Subjunktiven. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 54(4): 398–415. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, N. (2010). Coordination in Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.