Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 79, 2020
International Scientific and Practical Conference “Theory and Practice of Project Management in Education: Horizons and Risks”
Article Number 01018
Number of page(s) 5
Section Status and Prospects of Modern Education Digitalization
Published online 19 August 2020
  1. E.A. Mikhaylychev, Conceptual pedagogical diagnostics: formation, achievements, problems and development prospects: monograph (Taganrog State Pedagogical Institute, Taganrog, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  2. V.M. Polonsky, Assessment of knowledge of students (Znanie, Moscow, 1981) [Google Scholar]
  3. V.P. Bespalko, Components of pedagogical technology (Pedagogy, Moscow, 1989) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Aierbe, E. Oregui, I. Bartau, Education Review 36, 100–116 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Al-Sada, K. Jiang, S. Ranade, Virtual Reality 24, 191–209 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Berti, Italian Open Education: Virtual Reality Immersions for the Language Classroom, in New case studies of openness in and beyond the language classroom (2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. S.P.R.K. Bhama, V. Hariharasubramanian, O.P. Mythili, Virtual Reality 24, 163–173 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Birt, M. Cowling, Assessing mobile mixed reality affordances as a comparative visualization pedagogy for design communication. Research in Learning Technology 26 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Bortnik, N. Stozhko, I. Pervukhina, A. Tchernysheva, G. Belysheva, Research in Learning Technology 25 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Casañ-Pitarch, Digital Education Review 31, 80–92 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Checa, A. Bustillo, Advantages and limits of virtual reality in learning processes: Briviesca in the fifteenth century. Virtual Reality 24 151–161, (2020). Retrieved from: [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Ellis, P. Anderson, Journal of Instructional Pedagogies 6, 1-12 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Faria E. Guilherme, J. Pintassilgo, M.J. Mogarro, A.S. Pinho, M. Baptista, I. Chagas, C. Galvão, Digital Education Review 36, 85-99 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Gaspar, L. Morgado, H. Mamede, Virtual Reality 24, 319–341 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Godwin-Jones, Language Learning & Technology 8(3), 9-14 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  16. M.C. Lam, M.J. Sadik, N.F. Elias, Virtual Reality (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Liu K. Lu, Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 24(2), (2012) [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Morasse, E. Vera-Estay, M.H. Beauchamp, Virtual Reality (2020) [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Rebenitsch, C. Owen, Virtual Reality (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Rosselló, C. Pinya, Digital Education Review 31, 20–38 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Sejdiu, Digital Education Review 32, 60–72 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Su, S. Chen, P. Lin, Virtual Reality 24, 241–254 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Vasilevski, J. Birt, Research in Learning Technology 28 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Zahabi, A.M. Abdul Razak, Virtual Reality (2020) [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Torre, International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education 27(1), (2020) Available at: [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Roussou, M. Oliver, M. Slater, Virtual Reality 10, 227–240 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.