EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 82 (2020) SHS Web Conf., 82 (2020) 02003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 82, 2020
SCAN’20 - 9e Séminaire de Conception Architecturale Numérique
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Building Information Modeling : Epistémologie de la conception architecturale numérique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208202003
Published online 09 November 2020
  1. Alfares, M., Seireg, A. (1996). An integrated system for computer-aided design and constructionof reinforced concrete buildings using modular forms. Automation in Construction. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alshawi, M., & Underwood, J. (1996). Applying object-oriented analysis to the integration of design and construction. Automation in Construction, 5(2), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-5805(95)00023-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arayici, Y., Fernando, T., Munoz, V., & Bassanino, M. (2018). Interoperability specification development for integrated BIM use in performance based design. Automation in Construction, 85, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, F.E., Cooper, G.S., Ford, S., Aouad, G., Brandon, P., Child, T., … Young, B. (1995). An integrated approach to CAD: modelling concepts in building design and construction. Design Studies, 16(3), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00002-U [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burbidge, J.L., Falster, P., Riis, J.O., & Svendsen, O.M. (1987). Integration in Manufacturing. Computers in Industry, 9(4), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-3615(87)90103-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carpo, M. (2017). The Second Digital Turn, Design Beyond Intelligence. MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ciribini, A.L.C., Mastrolembo Ventura, S., & Paneroni, M. (2016). Implementation of an interoperable process to optimise design and construction phases of a residential building: A BIM Pilot Project. Automation in Construction, 71, 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.03.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Díaz, H., Alarcón, L.F., Mourgues, C., & García, S. (2017). Multidisciplinary Design Optimization through process integration in the AEC industry: Strategies and challenges. Automation in Construction, 73, 102-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.09.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eastman, C.M., Chase, S.C., & Assal, H.H. (1993). System architecture for computer integration of design and construction knowledge. 13. [Google Scholar]
  10. Eastman, C.M., Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., & Sacks, R. (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  11. El-Bibany, H., & Paulson, B.C. (1994). Collaborative Knowledge-integration Systems: A Tool for AEC Design, Management, and Coordination. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 9(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.1994.tb00359.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Evbuomwan, N.F.O., & Anumba, C.J. (1998). An integrated framework for concurrent life-cycle design and construction. Advances in Engineering Software, 29(7-9), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(98)00024-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fenves, S.J., Flemming, U., Hendrickson, C., Maher, M.L., & Schmitt, G. (1990). Integrated software environment for building design and construction. Computer-Aided Design, 22(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(90)90026-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fuchs, S., & Scherer, R.J. (2017). Multimodels — Instant nD-modeling using original data. Automation in Construction, 75, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.11.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Grilo, A., Zutshi, A., Jardim-Goncalves, R., & Steiger-Garcao, A. (2013). Construction collaborative networks: the case study of a building information modelling-based office building project. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 26(1-2), 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2012.681918 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Howard, H.C., Levitt, R.E., Paulson, B.C., Pohl, J.G., & Tatum, C.B. (1989). Computer Integration: Reducing Fragmentation in AEC Industry. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 3(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1989)3:1(18) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hu, Z.-Z., Zhang, X.-Y., Wang, H.-W., & Kassem, M. (2016). Improving interoperability between architectural and structural design models: An industry foundation classes-based approach with web-based tools. Automation in Construction, 66, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.02.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kiwan, M.S., & Munns, A.K. (1996). A neutral object data model for integrated building design and construction environment. Advances in Engineering Software, 25(2-3), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-9978(95)00105-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Luiten, G.T., Tolman, F.P., & Fischer, M.A. (1998). Project-modelling in AEC to integrate design and construction. Computers in Industry, 35(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(97)00081-X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. McGraw - Hill. (2012). The Business Value in BIM North America - Multi-year Trend Analysis and Users Ratings (2007-2012). Retrieved from McGraw - Hill website: https://bimforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/MHC-Business-Value-of-BIM-in-North-America-2007-2012-SMR.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. Morel, P., & Girard, C. (2017). Nous pensons qu’il faut dynamiter la façon d’enseigner l’architecture en France. Le Monde. Retrieved from https://www.lemonde.fr/campus/article/2017/06/24/nous-pensons-qu-il-faut-dynamiter-lafacon-d-enseigner-l-architecture-en-france_5150594_4401467.html [Google Scholar]
  22. Norton, B., Lo, S.N.G., Cronin, K.P., & Yohanis, Y.G. (1995). Towards the harmonious integration of information technology in building design and construction. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 16(2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.1995.9675675 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Perisic, A., Lazic, M., & Perisic, B. (2016). The Extensible Orchestration Framework approach to collaborative design in architectural, urban and construction engineering. Automation in Construction, 71, 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Reinschmidt, K.F., Griffis, F.H. (Bud), & Bronner, P.L. (1991). Integration of Engineering, Design, and Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(4), 756-772. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1991)117:4(756) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Santos, R., Costa, A.A., & Grilo, A. (2017). Bibliometric analysis and review of Building Information Modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015. Automation in Construction, 80, 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sattler, L., Lamouri, S., Pellerin, R., Paviot, T., & Deneux, D. (2019). A literature review about BIM interoperability and collaboration for design and construction between 2013 and 2018. (Under Revier). [Google Scholar]
  27. Sattler, L., & Maigne, T. (2018). L’ère post-BIM – Pour une obsolescence déprogrammée : une étude de cas de deux projets de Frank Gehry en France, de 2008 à 2016. Dnarchitecture. Retrieved from https://dnarchi.fr/experimentations/lere-post-bimpour-une-obsolescence-deprogrammee-une-etude-de-cas-de-deux-projets-de-frank-gehryen-france-de-2008-a-2016-i-iii/ [Google Scholar]
  28. van Nederveen, G.A., & Tolman, F.P. (1992). Modelling multiple views on buildings. Automation in Construction, 1(3), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-5805(92)90014-B [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yamazaki, Y. (1992). Integrated design and construction planning system for Computer Integrated Construction. 6. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.