The Perception of Teleworking by University Students Before and During the COVID-19 Crisis

Open Access

Issue		SHS Web of Conf. Volume 92, 2021 The 20^th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020


Article Number		04023
Number of page(s)		8
Section		Innovation and Investment on Industry 4.0
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219204023
Published online		13 January 2021

Hamblin, H. (1995). Employees’ perspectives on one dimension of labour flexibility: working at a distance. Work, Employment and Society, 9(3), 473-498. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mendlova, I. (2019). (Ne)zamestnanost v dobe „blahobytu”. Statistika a my, 17.1.2019. Retrieved from: https://www.statistikaamy.cz/2019/01/17/nezamestnanost-v-dobe-blahobytu/. [Google Scholar]
Park, S., & Cho, Y. J. (2020). Does telework status affect the behavior and perception of supervisors? Examining task behavior and perception in the telework context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-26. [Google Scholar]
Chung, H., van der Horst, M., (2020). Flexible Working and Unpaid Overtime in the UK: The Role of Gender, Parental and Occupational Status, Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 495-520. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mahler, J. (2012). The telework divide: Managerial and personnel challenges of telework. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(4), 407-418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Illegems, V., Verbeke, A., & S’Jegers, R. (2001). The organizational context of teleworking implementation. Technological forecasting and social change, 68(3), 275-291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Johnson, L. C., Andrey, J., & Shaw, S. M. (2007). Mr. Dithers comes to dinner: Telework and the merging of women’s work and home domains in Canada. Gender, Place & Culture, 14(2), 141-161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 336-361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior–subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(1), 77-88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(4), 383-400. [Google Scholar]
Davidescu, A. A., Apostu, S. A., Paul, A., & Casuneanu, I. (2020). Work Flexibility, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance among Romanian Employees—Implications for Sustainable Human Resource Management. Sustainability, 12(15), 6086. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hopkins, J. L., & McKay, J. (2019). Investigating ‘anywhere working’as a mechanism for alleviating traffic congestion in smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 142-258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Maruyama, T., & Tietze, S. (2012). From anxiety to assurance: Concerns and outcomes of telework. Personnel Review, 41(4), 450-469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Harris, L. (2003). Home‐based teleworking and the employment relationship: Managerial challenges and dilemmas, Personnel Review, 32(4), 422-437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Eurofound. (2020). Living, working and COVID-19: First findings – April 2020. Online Retrieved from: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2020/livi ng-working-and-covid-19-first-findings-april-2020. [Google Scholar]
European Commision. (2020). European Semester: Commission Communication on Country Specific Recommendations. Online Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2020-european-semester-commission-communication-countryspecifi c-recommendationsen. [Google Scholar]
Jobspin. (2018). Eurostat: Fewer Czechs work from home compared to EU average. Retrieved from: https://www.jobspin.cz/2018/08/eurostat-fewer-czechs-work-from-home-compared-to-eu-average/. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.