Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 05002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Collaborative Economics, Digital Platforms and Multimedia
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219205002
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Anderson, H. J., Stejskal, J. (2019). Evaluating the Impact of Marketing, Organisational and Process Innovation On Innovation Output of Information Technology Firms: Czech Republic and Estonia. In O. Dvouletý, M. Lukeš & J. Mísař, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, (pp. 31-41). Prague. [Google Scholar]
  2. IBM Hybrid Data Management (2020, September 17). Accelerating AI with Data Management; Accelerating Data, Management with AI. Retrieved from : https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/YD5R1XLB [Google Scholar]
  3. OECD (2019, June 20). “Data in the digital age”, OECD Going Digital Policy Note. Retrieved from : https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/data-in-the-digitalage.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Cai W., Liu, F., Dinolov, O, Xie, J., Liu, P., Tuo, J. (2018). Energy benchmarking rules in machining systems. Energy, 142, 258-263. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu C., Cai, W., Dinolov, O., Zhang, C., Rao, W., Jia, S., Li, L., Chan, F. (2018). Emergy based sustainability evaluation of remanufacturing machining systems. Energy, 150, 150-670. [Google Scholar]
  6. Stoycheva, B., Antonova, D. (2018). Investigating Factor Interactions in Formalising the Process of Developing New Products. Serbian Journal of Management, 13(1), 173-184. [Google Scholar]
  7. Harvard Biomedical Data Management. (2019, August 5). HMS Data Management Working Group. Retrieved from : https://datamanagement.hms.harvard.edu/hms-data-manage¬ment-working-group [Google Scholar]
  8. FORCE11. (2020, January 20). The FAIR Data Principles. Retrieved from : https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples [Google Scholar]
  9. Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hitz, Ch., Vojvodic, M., Wicki, Gr. (2019). Principles of Data Definition for the Use of Measuring Governance. In O. Dvouletý. M. Lukeš & J. Mísař (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (pp. 265-278), Prague. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ghinea, V., Mihaylova, L., Papazov, E. (2015). Organizational Culture Dynamics. Complex Systems Dynamics. Quality – Access to Success, 147(16), 99-105. [Google Scholar]
  12. Marinov, M., I. Valova. (2019). Component Interaction in Distributed Knowledge-Based Systems. TEM Journal – Technology education management informatics, 8(3), 721-727. [Google Scholar]
  13. Harvard Catalyst (2019, August 12). An Investigator’s Guide to Research Data Management Practices. Retrieved from : https://catalyst.harvard.edu/pdf/regulatory/-Investigators%20Guide%20to%20RDM%20practice.pdf [Google Scholar]
  14. Aliev, Y., Kozov, V., Ivanova, G., Ivanov, A. (2017). 3D Augmented Reality Software Solution for Mechanical Engineering Education. In B. Rachev & A. Smrikarov1 (Eds.), 18th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (pp. 318-325). Ruse: Association for Computing Machinery. [Google Scholar]
  15. LIBER (2019, February 04). Open Access Working Group: Statement on Plan S guidelines. Retrieved from : https://libereurope.eu/blog/2019/02/04/open-access-working-group-statement-on-plan-s-guidelines/ [Google Scholar]
  16. Science Europe (2018, November). Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management. Retrieved from : https://www.scienceeurope.org/media/jezkhnoo/se_rdm_practical_guide_final.pdf [Google Scholar]
  17. DCMI (2020, January 15). The Dublin Core™ Metadata Initiative (official website). Retrieved from : https://www.dublincore.org/ [Google Scholar]
  18. Mikhaylov, A., Peker, I. (2019). Spatial Patterns of Innovation Geography: Knowledge Generation Domain in Russia. In O. Dvouletý, M. Lukeš & J. Mísař (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, (pp. 624-637). Prague. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dvouletý, O., A. Pilková, J. Mikuš, M. Rimská. (2019). Entrepreneurial Activity in Slovakia: Selected Regional Aspects and The Role of Governmental Environment. In O. Dvouletý, M. Lukeš & J. Mísař (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, (pp. 161-171). Prague. [Google Scholar]
  20. DCC (2013). Checklist for a Data Management Plan. v.4.0. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Retrieved from : http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/data-management-plans [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.