Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 110, 2021
International Conference on Economics, Management and Technologies 2021 (ICEMT 2021)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | E-learning | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111003002 | |
| Published online | 11 June 2021 | |
- E. G. Azimov, A. N. Shchukin, New Dictionary of Methodological Terms and Concepts (Theory and Practice of Language Teaching) (Moscow, IKAR, 2009). [Google Scholar]
- O. M. Smirnova, M. B. Balycheva, Postmodernism and technological effectiveness of education – the pros and cons, Science, education, youth in the modern world: Materials of the international scientific and methodological conference, Moscow, Russian State University of Oil and Gas, 141–146 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- E. A. Kostina, Zh. S. Soboleva Theoretical comprehension of the essence and structure of the concepts “pedagogical technology”, “technologization of the educational process”, “adaptability”, “criteria of adaptability” in the framework of university foreign language education, Humanitarian research. Pedagogy and Psychology, 3, 49–56 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- E. Barbera, B. G. Kirschner, Paradox of time in research on educational technology, Time & Society, 24-1, 96–108 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- Y. J. Kang, A. D. Ritzhaupt, A Job Announcement Analysis of Educational Technology Professional Positions: Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43-3, 231–256 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. V. Startsev, Distance education: where are the advantages? Psychological and pedagogical journal Gaudeamus, 19-2, 99–106 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- P. Faisal, Z. Kisman, Information and communication technology utilization effectiveness in distance education systems, International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 12 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- D. Yi, Accessibility analysis of distance education resources based on multiple constraint model, The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 1 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- K. S. Grigorieva, Comparative analysis of the innovative technology of differentiated education and the original traditional teaching technology, Pedagogical science and education in dialogue with time: Materials of the V International scientific and practical conference (Astrakhan, ASU, 2020). [Google Scholar]
- D. A. Veneri, K. Zdanis, Are technology-informed methods better than traditional approaches in educating patients? A meta-analysis, Health Education Journal, 77-3, 261–276 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I. A. Ostapenko, M. N. Krylova, Pedagogy of higher education: a textbook (Zernograd, AchII, 2017). [Google Scholar]
- W. F. Crittenden, I. K. Biel, W. A. Lovely, Embracing Digitalization: Student Learning and New Technologies, Journal of Marketing Education, 41-1, 5–14 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- M.N. Krylova, Interactive methods in the teaching of the humanities in a technical university, Prospects for Science and Education, 4, 39–46 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- C. Owen, S. Riley, Teaching Visual Methods Using Performative Storytelling, Reflective Practice and Learning through Doing, Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11-1, 60–65 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Diethei, F. Ertle, T. Grundgeiger, Ch. Mengelkamp, V. Held, E-Learning vs. E-Learning with Hands-on: An Experimental Study to Improve Clinical Skills, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61-1, 660 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. A. Roumell, F. D. Salajan, The Evolution of U.S. e-Learning Policy: A Content Analysis of the National Education Technology Plans, Educational Policy, 30-2, 365–371 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- D. N. Mutisya, G. L. Makokha, Challenges affecting adoption of e-learning in public universities in Kenya, E-Learning and Digital Media, 13-3, 140–157 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. A. Zhadko, E-learning technologies: problems of implementation in Russia, Economy, society, people: theory, methodology, reality: Collection of scientific publications (Yekaterinburg, USUE, 2015). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.