Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 140, 2022
2022 International Conference on Information Technology in Education and Management Engineering (ITEME2022)
Article Number 01047
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214001047
Published online 25 May 2022
  1. Hayter C S, Lubynsky R, Maroulis S. Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs[J]. J. Technol. Transf., 2017, 42(6): 1237-1254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Zilvinskis J, Masseria A A, Pike G R. Student engagement and student learning: Examining the convergent and discriminant validity of the revised national survey of student engagement[J]. Res. High. Educ., 2017, 58(8): 880-903. [Google Scholar]
  3. Peters H, Zdravkovic M, João Costa M, et al. Twelve tips for enhancing student engagement[J]. Med. Teach., 2019, 41(6): 632-637. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alicea S, Suárez-Orozco C, Singh S, et al. Observing classroom engagement in community college: A systematic approach[J]. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal., 2016, 38(4): 757-782. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hardman J. Tutor-student interaction in seminar teaching: Implications for professional development[J]. Act. Learn. High. Educ., 2016, 17(1): 63-76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caratelli L A, Bostwick J R, Templin T, et al. Development and evaluation of an interprofessional seminar pilot course to enhance collaboration between health professions at a student-run clinic for underserved populations[J]. J. Interprofessional Care, 2020, 34(3): 422-426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang M T, Willett J B, Eccles J S. The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity[J]. J. Sch. Psychol., 2011, 49(4): 465-480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fredricks J A, Blumenfeld P C, Paris A H. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence[J]. Rev. Educ. Res., 2004, 74(1): 59-109. [Google Scholar]
  9. Prendergast S, Rickinson M. Understanding school engagement in and with research[J]. Aust. Educ. Res., 2019, 46(1): 17-39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zepke N, Leach L. Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action[J]. Act. Learn. High. Educ., 2010, 11(3): 167-177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Appleton J J, Christenson S L, Furlong M J. Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct[J]. Psychol. Schools, 2008, 45(5): 369-386. [Google Scholar]
  12. Olivier E, Archambault I, De Clercq M, et al. Student self-efficacy, classroom engagement, and academic achievement: Comparing three theoretical frameworks[J]. J. Youth Adolesc., 2019, 48(2): 326-340. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bandura A, Adams N E, Hardy A B, et al. Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory[J]. Cogn. Ther. Res., 1980, 4(1): 39-66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Van Dinther M, Dochy F, Segers M. Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education[J]. Educ. Res. Rev., 2011, 6(2): 95-108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xerri M J, Radford K, Shacklock K. Student engagement in academic activities: A social support perspective[J]. High. Educ., 2018, 75(4): 589-605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pan J, Zaff J F, Donlan A E. Social support and academic engagement among reconnected youth: Adverse life experiences as a moderator[J]. J. Res. Adolesc., 2017, 27(4): 890-906. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wit D J D, Karioja K, Rye B J, et al. Perceptions of declining classmate and teacher support following the transition to high school: Potential correlates of increasing student mental health difficulties[J]. Psychol. Schools, 2011, 48(6): 556-572. [Google Scholar]
  18. Roorda D L, Koomen H M Y, Spilt J L, et al. The influence of affective teacherstudent relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A metaanalytic approach[J]. Rev. Educ. Res., 2011, 81(4): 493-529. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mercer S H, Nellis L M, Martínez R S, et al. Supporting the students most in need: Academic self-efficacy and perceived teacher support in relation to within-year academic growth[J]. J. Sch. Psychol., 2011, 49(3): 323-338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang Z, Bergin C, Bergin D A. Measuring engagement in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms: The classroom engagement inventory[J]. Sch. Psychol. Q., 2014, 29(4): 517-535. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pintrich P R, De Groot E V. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance[J]. J. Educ. Psychol., 1990, 82(1): 33-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Torsheim T, Samdal O, Rasmussen M, et al. Cross-national measurement invariance of the teacher and classmate support scale[J]. Soc. Indic. Res., 2012, 105(1): 145-160. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.