Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 155, 2023
2022 2nd International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2022)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Research on Social Development and Humanities Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315501008
Published online 12 January 2023
  1. Chalmers, A. et al. (2021) “Realistic humans in virtual cultural heritage,” Emerging Technologies and the Digital Transformation of Museums and Heritage Sites, pp. 156–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delbridge, M., (2015). Motion capture in performance: an introduction. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fanzhuo, D. et al. (2021) “Emotional drain in digital design for inheritance of Intangible Cultural Heritage,” E3S Web of Conferences, 236, p. 05029. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hou, Y. et al. (2022) “Digitizing intangible cultural heritage embodied: State of the art,” Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(3), pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang Hui. (2020) “On the Design Programming Method of Interactive Products under Emotional Design [J]”. Popular Literature and Art, (14): 106107 [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, L., (2012) “Does intangible cultural heritage law resolve everything in China,” J. Int’l Com. L. & Tech., 7, p. 355. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu Huaiyu. (2006). The Mediocrity and Miracle of Modernity: A Textual Interpretation of Lefebvre’s Critical Philosophy of Daily Life. Central Compilation Press, Beijing. [Google Scholar]
  8. Manovich, L., (2013). Software takes command (Vol. 5). A&C Black. [Google Scholar]
  9. Meng Jun. (2012). “From techno-rational critique, technological supremacy to technological dominance - On the impact of technology on media power.” Contemporary Communication (1), 3 [Google Scholar]
  10. Perez-Seijo, S. and Vicente, P.N. (2022) “After the hype: How hi-tech is reshaping journalism,” Studies in Big Data, pp. 41–52. [Google Scholar]
  11. Postman, N. (2011). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sang, X. et al. (2018) “Interactive floating fullparallax digital three-dimensional light-field display based on wavefront recomposing,” Optics Express, 26(7), pp. 8883–8889. [Google Scholar]
  13. Skublewska-Paszkowska, M. et al. (2022) “3D technologies for intangible cultural heritage preservation—literature review for selected databases,” Heritage Science, 10(1), p. 3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sorea, D. and Csesznek, C. (2020) “Intangible Cultural Heritage of the Fagaras Land. Priority Dimensions,” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series VII: Social Sciences • Law, pp. 155–164. [Google Scholar]
  15. Stavrakis, E. et al. (2012) “Digitization of Cypriot Folk Dances,” Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation, pp. 404–413. [Google Scholar]
  16. Swensen, G. et al. (2013) “Capturing the intangible and tangible aspects of heritage: Personal versus official perspectives in Cultural Heritage Management,” Landscape Research, 38(2), pp. 203221. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang Ailing. (2009). “Media culture: The paradigm of mass culture dominated by ‘technological rationality,” Journal of Culture (2), 5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang Weihua. (2011). “Digital and Physical Exhibition of Cultural Heritage in Museums,” Southeast Culture (05), pp. 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  19. What is Intangible Cultural Heritage? [online]. Available at: https://intangibleculturalheritage.unesco.org/en/what-is-intangible-heritage-00003. (Accessed 10 Sep 2022) [Google Scholar]
  20. Wulf, C. (2020) “Performativity and dynamics of Intangible Cultural Heritage,” Ritual, Heritage and Identity, pp. 76–94. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xiao Bo, & Qian Shan. (2018). “Technology Cult and Cultural Dissonance in the Tourism Performing Arts Industry - The Case of Wuhan’s Hanshow,” Journal of Tongji University: Social Science Edition, 29(1), 10. [Google Scholar]
  22. Xie, R. (2021) “Intangible Cultural Heritage High-Definition Digital Mobile Display Technology Based on VR Virtual Visualization,” Mobile Information Systems, p. e4034729. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang Gao, Peng Chen. (2020) “Technology Dominance and Emotional Zero: Reflections on the Digital Technology Ethics of ‘intangible cultural Heritage,” [J]. Guangxi Social Science, No. 30107 p. 140–145. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang Li, Zhu Rong, Niu, Chao and Shao Siyu, (2016) “Research on the Protection and Communication of Intangible Cultural Heritage in 3D Digitalization: A Case Study of Huishan Clay Figurines[J],” Decoration, no. 280, pp. 126–127. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ziagkas, E. et al. (2019) “Greek Traditional Dances Capturing and a Kinematic Analysis Approach of the Greek Traditional Dance “Syrtos” (Terpsichore Project),” In Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies and Leaming, pp. 514–523. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.