Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 156, 2023
International Conference on Teaching and Learning – Digital Transformation of Education and Employability (ICTL 2022)
Article Number 06001
Number of page(s) 9
Section E-learning and Online learning
Published online 13 January 2023
  1. Barbara M., Yukie T., Robert M., Marianne B., and Karla J., (2010) Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies, U.S. Department of Education. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alstete, J. (1995). ED402800 1995-00-00 Benchmarking in Higher Education: Adapting Best Practices to Improve Quality. ERIC Digest. [Google Scholar]
  3. akpan, c. p. (n.d.). Chapter 11 Quality Assurance Management In Higher Education. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernard R.M., Abrami P.C., Lou Y., Borokhovski E., Wade A., Wozney L., Wallet P.A., Fiset M., and Huang B., (2004) How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A Meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Education, Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, no. 3, p. 379–439. Course quality: A study on implementation of course quality standards. Online Learning [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darman, D. R., Suherman, Anriani, N., Wibowo, F. C., Faizin, M. N., Samsudin, A., Suhandi, A., Supriyatman, Suherman, A., Nurhaji, S., Nurtanto, M., Ramdani, S. D., Abizar, H., Fawaid, M., Nulhakim, L., & Siswanto. (2019). Effectiveness of learning support of asset (assessment simulation test) for reconstruction physics conception. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, D. (2014). Quality Management for Organizational Excellence: Introduction to Total Quality. (7ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar]
  7. European Commission. (2019). Benchmarking of Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Experiences from the FOCUS Project [Google Scholar]
  8. Forum, A. (2008). Implementing and using quality assurance: strategy and practice. A Selection of Papers from the 2nd European Quality Assurance Forum, 93. [Google Scholar]
  9. Foster, S. (2004). Managing Quality: An Integrative Approach (2 ed.). New Jesery: Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gora, A. A., Ştefan, S. C., Popa, Ş. C., & Albu, C. F. (2019). Students’ perspective onquality assurance in higher education in the context of sustainability: A PLS-SEM approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(17). [Google Scholar]
  11. Gürsul F., and Keser, H., (2009) The Effectsof online and face-to-face problem-based learning environments in mathematics education on students’ academic achievement, Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28172824. [Google Scholar]
  12. Harris, L. A. (2021). The National Science Foundation: An Overview. [Google Scholar]
  13. Houston, D., & Paewai, S. (2013). Knowledge, power and meanings shaping quality assurance in higher education: a sytemic critique. Qaulity in Higher Education., 19(3), 261-282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jungblut, J., Vukasovic, M., & Stensaker, B. (2015b). Student perspectives on quality in higher education. http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/21568235.2014.998693, 5(2), 157–180. [Google Scholar]
  15. Krause, K. L. (2012). Addressing the wickedproblem of quality in higher education: theoretical approaches and implications. https://Doi.Org/10.1080/07294360.2011.634381, 31(3), 285–297. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kundu, G. K. (2017). Quality in higher education from different perspectives: A literature review. International Journal for Quality Research, 11(1), 17–34. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lederman, D. (2020) (March 18,. Will shift to remote teaching be boon or bane for inlinelearning? Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from file:///D:/COVID/Most%20teaching%20is%20going%20remote.%20Will%20that%20help%20or%20hurt%20online%20learning.html. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu, S., Meng, Z., & Tang, M. (2015). Impact of Quality Assurance on Higher Education Institutions: A Literature Review. Higher Education and Development, 9(2), 17-34. [Google Scholar]
  20. lzafari, K., & Ursin, J. (2019). Implementation of quality assurance standards in European higher eduaction: Does context matter? Quality in Higher Education, 25(1), 58-75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Masengu, R., & Ruzive, B. (2021). (PDF) Application of Digital technologies in the 21st Century. Literature Review of Experiences,Opportunities and Challenges in Higher Education. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mishra L., Gupta T., and Shree A., (2020) Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of Covid-19pandemic. International Journal of Educational; Research Open. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nair, C. S., Patil, A., & Mertova, P. (2011). Enhancing the quality of engineering education by utilising student feedback: Quality and the engineering student experience: An institutional approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), 3–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Narayan Biswal, B. (2016). Ethical Issues in School Educational Management. Issues and Ideas in Education, 4(1), 29–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nassoura. (2020). (13) (PDF) Measuring Students’ Perceptions Of Online Learning In Higher Education. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nugroho, B. H., & Jaqin, C. (2021). Implementation of Benchmarking Method for Higher Education Institution: A Literature Review. In IJIEM (Indonesian Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management) (Vol. 2, Issue 2). [Google Scholar]
  27. Prisacariu, A. (2015). New Perspectives of Quality Assurance in European Higher Education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 119–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yeung, C. L., Zhou, L., & Armatas, C. (2019). An Overview of Benchmarks Regarding Quality Assurance for e-Learning in Higher Education. 2019 IEEE Conference on E-Learning, e-Management and eServices, IC3e 2019, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yuan, W., Dahar Minghat, A., &Habibah Binti Abdul Talib, H. (2021). REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL GEOGRAPHICAL EDUCATION Quality Assurance in Higher Education, a Global Perspective. Perspective. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(4), 1682–1695. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sullivan, L. P. (n.d.). The Power of Taguchi Methods To Impact Change In u.s. Companies. [Google Scholar]
  31. Warter, I. (2019). The Nexus Between Ethics and Quality in Higher Education. Case Study. Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics, 2(2), 113–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xia, C., Qiu, H., & Cheng, S.M. (2019) Challenges and opportunities of for effective assessment within a quality assurance formassive open online courses. Journal of Hospitality Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education. Vol 24. 1-16. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rodriguez, J., Valenzuela, M., & Ayuyao, N. (2018). TQM paradigm for higher education in the Philippines. Quality Assurance in Education, 26(1), 101–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sandra, Caeir, Leyla Hamón, Rute Martins,& Cecilia Aldaz. (2021). (2) Benchmarking In Higher Education: A Framework For Benchmarking For Quality Improvement Purposes. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zimmerman, W., Altman, B., Simunich, B., Shattuck, K., & Burch, B. (2020). Evaluating online course quality: A study on implementation of course quality standards. Online Learning Journal, 24(4), 147–163. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zimmerman, W., Altman, B., Simunich, B., Shattuck, K., & Burch, B. (2020). Evaluating online. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.