Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 156, 2023
International Conference on Teaching and Learning – Digital Transformation of Education and Employability (ICTL 2022)
Article Number 07005
Number of page(s) 7
Section T&L Tracking and Simulation
Published online 13 January 2023
  1. Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). The power of assessment feedback in teaching and learning: a narrative review and synthesis of the literature. SN Social Sciences, 1(3), 1-44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahea, M., Ahea, M., Kabir, R., & Rahman, I. (2016). The Value and Effectiveness of Feedback in Improving Students' Learning and Professionalizing Teaching in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 38-41. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aparicio, A. C., & Ruiz-Teran, A. M. (2007). Tradition and innovation in teaching structural design in civil engineering. [Google Scholar]
  4. Banister, C. (2020). Exploring peer feedback processes and peer feedback meta-dialogues with learners of academic and business English. Language Teaching Research, 1362168820952222. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergil, A. S., & Atli, I. (2012). Different perspectives about feedback on teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5833-5839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chopra, A. (2012). Introduction to google sketchup. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  7. Colbran, S., Gilding, A., & Colbran, S. (2017). Animation and multiple-choice questions as a formative feedback tool for legal education. The Law Teacher, 51(3), 249273. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dikli, S. (2003). Assessment at a distance: Traditional vs. alternative assessments. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 2(3), 13-19. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hughes, G., Smith, H., & Creese, B. (2015). Not seeing the wood for the trees: developing a feedback analysis tool to explore feed forward in modularised programmes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1079-1094. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fernandes, S. R. G. (2014). Preparing graduates for professional practice: findings from a case study of Project-based Learning (PBL). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 139, 219-226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mc Lean, H. (2018). This is the way to teach: insights from academics and students about assessment that supports learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1228-1240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Misko, J. (2000). The Effects of Different Modes of Delivery: Student Outcomes and Evaluations. National Centre for Vocational Education Research, 252 Kensington Road, Leabrook, South Australia 5068, Australia (Print edition: Stock no. 440, ISBN-0-87397610-X, $27.50 Australian). [Google Scholar]
  13. Murray, A. (2007). Biz of Acq--Learning@ Your Library [Conference]: Kolb's Experimental Learning Model and the Institutional Learning Process. Against the Grain, 19(1), 28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 128-138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Subheesh, N. P., & Sethy, S. S. (2020). Learning through assessment and feedback practices: A critical review of engineering education settings. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), em1829. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. University College London, (2017), “Assessment and feedback A guide for UCL students”, UCL Office of the Vice-Provost (Education and Student Affairs). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.