Open Access
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 174, 2023
2023 2nd International Conference on Science Education and Art Appreciation (SEAA 2023)
Article Number 01032
Number of page(s) 5
Section Educational Practice and Teaching Curriculum Reform
Published online 11 August 2023
  1. Roy Rumpa and AlAbsy Mujeeb Saif Mohsen.(2022). Impact of Critical Factors on the Effectiveness of Online Learning. Frontiers in Educational Research, Volume 14, Issue 21, PP 14073-14073 [Google Scholar]
  2. Hou Wenling. Factors influencing MOOC completion rate among college students [D]. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2020.DOI:10.27175/d.cnki.gjxcu. 2020.001702. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhuang will purple. The influencing factors of online learning continuous willingness and their promotion strategies [D]. And Jilin University, 2021.DOI:10.27162/d.cnki.gjlin. 2021.004366. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao Chenglin, Zhao Wenjun, Yang Hairu, Jiang Zhihui. Study on the influencing factors of continuous learning in online open courses under the credit system [J]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li Wei. Modern Long Distance Education, 2018(02):72-82.DOI:10.13927/j.cnki.yuan. 2018.0020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kunzhe Liu and Xiqiang Ge and Jiefeng Wang. (2023). Evaluation model of college students’ online learning level difference based on support vector machine. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 33(1), pp. 23-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhao Chengling, Zhou Fengling, Jiang Zhihui, Liang Yunzhen (2017), Research on the influencing factors of online learning space use intention from the perspective of TAM and SDT. Modern Distance Education, No. 173 (05): 3-11 [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, N., & Qiao, A. (2009). Exploration of the Essence and Theoretical Basis of Online Learning Activities. Chinese Distance Education, (01), 36-40+78. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shu-Sheng, (2007), 5 Liaw Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system Computers & Education, 1(2). [Google Scholar]
  10. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., et al. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2). [Google Scholar]
  11. Shen, Y. (2008). A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Constructivism and Social Constructivism in Learning Theories. Modern Educational Technology, 18(S1), 21-23. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.