Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 179, 2023
2023 6th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2023)
Article Number 03025
Number of page(s) 7
Section Social Media and Online Education Research
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317903025
Published online 14 December 2023
  1. Perloff, R.M. (2014) Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles, 71: 363–377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guzzetti, B.J. (2006) Cybergirls: Negotiating social identities on cybersites. E-Learning Digital Media, 3: 158–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sunstein, C.R. (2006) Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Festinger, L. (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat., 7: 117–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Suls, J., Martin, R., Wheeler, L. (2002) Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 11: 159–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lim, M., Yang, Y. (2015) Effects of users’ envy and shame on social comparison that occurs on social network services. Comput. Human Behav., 51: 300311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Orsatti, J., Riemer, K. (2015). Identity-Making: A multimodal approach for researching identity in social media. In: European Conference of Information Systems ResearchGate. Muenster. [Google Scholar]
  8. Latif, K., Weng, Q., Pitafi, A.H., Ali, A., Siddiqui, A.W., Malik, M.Y., Latif, Z. (2021) Social comparison as a double-edged sword on social media: The role of envy type and online social identity. Telemat. Inform., 56: 101470. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaskazi, A. (2014). Social network identity: Facebook, twitter and identity negotiation theory. In: IConference 2014 Proceedings. Berlin, Germany. pp. 858–859. [Google Scholar]
  10. Swann, W.B., Ely, R.J. (1984) A battle of wills: Selfverification versus behavioral confirmation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 46: 1287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Unger, M.A. (2015) The Aporia of presentation: Deconstructing the genre of K-pop girl group music videos in South Korea. J. Pop. Music Stud., 27: 25–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Paanalahti Abrahamsson, I. (2018) How women are portrayed in K-pop music videos: an example of how gender is constructed in media. Sociology, Art. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, K.B. (2014) Narratives about the media, diet, and body image: A cross-cultural comparison between young female adults in the Midwestern United States and South Korea. J. Intercult. Commun. Res., 43: 283303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Muhammad, A.A., Nia Nafisah, S.S. (2020) Women Stereotype in K-pop Girl Group Songs. S1. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu, C., Luo, M. (2016) A multimodal discourse analysis of tmall's double eleven advertisement. Engl. Lang. Teach., 9: 156–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cui, X. (2023) Hanfu as therapeutic governance in neo/non-liberal China: a multimodal discourse analysis of Hanfu videos on Bilibili. Chin. J. Commun., 16: 186–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Iftikhar, S., Shahnaz, A., Masroor, F. (2019) Multimodal discourse analysis of the poster covers of academy award winning animated feature movies. Putaj Huma. Soc. Sci., 26. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pratiwy, D., Wulan, S. (2018) Multimodal discourse analysis in Dettol Tv advertisement. KnE Soc. Sci., 207–217. [Google Scholar]
  19. Butler, J. (1988) Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre J., 40: 519–531. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hurley, Z. (2019) Imagined affordances of Instagram and the fantastical authenticity of female Gulf-Arab social media influencers. Soc. Media Soc., 5. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.