Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 187, 2024
2023 2nd International Conference on Educational Science and Social Culture (ESSC 2023)
Article Number 04005
Number of page(s) 5
Section Social Digital Development and Intercultural Communication
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418704005
Published online 20 March 2024
  1. Airey, C., Hales, J., Hamilton, R., Korovessis, C., McKernan, A. and Purdon, S. (2000). The 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(4), pp.497–499. doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Araújo, C. (2010). The Limits of Women’s Quotas in Brazil. IDS Bulletin, 41(5), pp.17–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00162.x. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barmes, L. (2009). EQUALITY LAW AND EXPERIMENTATION: THE POSITIVE ACTION CHALLENGE. The Cambridge Law Journal, [online] 68(3), pp.623–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197309990171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bond, S. (2002). Family-friendly working? : Putting Policy Into Action. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cockburn, C. (1989). Equal opportunities: the short and long agenda. Industrial Relations Journal, 20(3), pp.213–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.1989.tb00068.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collins, H. (2003). Discrimination, Equality and Social Inclusion. Modern Law Review, 66(1), pp.16–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.6601002. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dickens, L. (1999). Beyond the business case: a three-pronged approach to equality action. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(1), pp.9–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.1999.tb00185.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Government Equalities Office and Equality and Human Rights Commission (2013). Equality Act 2010. [online] GOV.UK. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/equality-act-2010-guidance [Accessed 9 Apr. 2023]. [Google Scholar]
  9. Grogan, M. (1999). Equity/Equality Issues of Gender, Race, and Class. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(4), pp.518–536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/00131619921968743. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hepple, B. (2010). The New Single Equality Act in Britain. Equal Rights Review, [online] Volume 5. Available at: https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/bob%20hepple.pdf [Accessed 9 Apr. 2023]. [Google Scholar]
  11. Holgate, J. and McKay, S. (2009). Equal opportunities policies: how effective are they in increasing diversity in the audio-visual industries’ freelance labour market? Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), pp.151–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708098250. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoque, K. and Noon, M. (2004). Equal Opportunities Policy and Practice in Britain: evaluating the ‘empty shell’ hypothesis. Work, Employment and Society, [online] 18(3), pp.481–506. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017004045547 [Accessed 9 Apr. 2023]. [Google Scholar]
  13. Humphreys, S. (2010). The Equality Act, 2010. Research Ethics, 6(3), pp.95–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600306. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jewson, N. and Mason, D. (1986). The Theory and Practice of Equal Opportunities Policies: Liberal and Radical Approaches. The Sociological Review, 34(2), pp.307–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1986.tb02704.x. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jewson, N. and Mason, D. (1994). ‘Race’, Employment and Equal Opportunities: Towards a Political Economy and an Agenda for the 1990s. The Sociological Review, 42(4), pp.591–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1994.tb00102.x. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kirton, G., Greene, A.-M. and Dean, D. (2007). British diversity professionals as change agents – radicals, tempered radicals or liberal reformers? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(11), pp.1979–1994. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701638226. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lawson, A. (2011). Disability and Employment in the Equality Act 2010: Opportunities Seized, Lost and Generated. Industrial Law Journal, 40(4), pp.359–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwr021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liff, S. (1999). Diversity and equal opportunities: room for a constructive compromise? Human Resource Management Journal, 9(1), pp.65–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.1999.tb00190.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liff, S. and Dale, K. (1994). Formal Opportunity, Informal Barriers: Black Women Managers within a Local Authority. Work, Employment & Society, 8(2), pp.177–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017094008002003. [Google Scholar]
  20. Noon, M. (2007). The fatal flaws of diversity and the business case for ethnic minorities. Work, Employment and Society, 21(4), pp.773–784. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007082886. [Google Scholar]
  21. Noon, M. (2010). The shackled runner: time to rethink positive discrimination? Work, Employment and Society, 24(4), pp.728–739. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017010380648. [Google Scholar]
  22. Roemer, J.E. and Trannoy, A. (2014). Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol 2A. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  23. Solanke, I. (2011). Infusing the Silos in the Equality Act 2010 with Synergy. Industrial Law Journal, [online] 40(4), pp.336–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwr024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tinker, I. (2004). Quotas for women in elected legislatures: Do they really empower women? Women’s Studies International Forum, [online] 27(5-6), pp.531–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2004.09.008. [Google Scholar]
  25. Von Wahl, A. (2005). Liberal, Conservative, Social Democratic, or ... European? The European Union as Equal Employment Regime. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(1), pp.67–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi007. [Google Scholar]
  26. (, J. (1997). The Politics of Equal Opportunity. Gender, Work & Organization, 4(3), pp.159–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.