EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 191 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 191 (2024) 14001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 14001
Number of page(s) 12
Section Syntaxe
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419114001
Published online 28 June 2024
  1. Abeillé, A. et Godard, D. (2021), La grande grammaire du français. Actes sud. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashby, W. J. (1977), Interrogative forms in Parisian French. Semasia, 4: 35–52. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brehm, L. et Alday, P. M. (2022), Contrast coding choices in a decade of mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 125, 104334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunetti, L., Tovena, L. M. et Yoo, H. (2022), French questions alternating between a reason and a manner interpretation. Linguistics Vanguard, 8(s2): 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brunetti, L., Yoo, H., Tovena, L. et Albar, R. (2021), French reason-comment (‘how’) questions: A view from prosody. Dans A. Trotzke et X. Villalba (dir.), Expressive Meaning Across Linguistic Levels and Frameworks. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Celle, A., Jugnet, A. et Lansari, L. (2021), Expressive questions in English and French: What the hell versus Mais qu’est-ce que. Dans A. Trotzke et X. Villalba (dir.), Expressive Meaning Across Linguistic Levels and Frameworks: 138–166. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198871217.003.0008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Celle, A. et Pélissier, M. (2022), Surprise questions in spoken French. Linguistics Vanguard, 8(s2): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cornulier, B. de. (1974), Pourquoi et l’inversion du sujet non clitique. Dans C. Rohrer et N. Ruwet (dir.), Linguistische Arbeiten: Vol. 13. Études de syntaxe: Actes du Colloque Franco-Allemand de Grammaire Transformationnelle: 139–163. de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111611761-010 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dayal, V. (2016), Questions (First edition). Oxford surveys in semantics and pragmatics: Vol. 4. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dekhissi, L. et Coveney, A. (2021). Le contexte linguistique des questions rhétoriques conflictuelles et la variation entre pourquoi et qu’est-ce que. Dans P. Larrivée et A. Guryev (dir.), Langue française: Vol. 212. Variantes formelles de l’interrogation: 123–137. [Google Scholar]
  11. Armand Colin. Desmets, M. et Gautier, A. (2009), « Comment n’y ai-je pas songé plus tôt ? », questions rhétoriques en comment. Travaux De Linguistique, 58(1): 107–125. https://doi.org/10.3917/tl.058.0107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Drummond, A. (2016), IbexFarm (Version 0.3). 9). [Google Scholar]
  13. Farkas, D. F. (2022), Non-Intrusive Questions as a Special Type of Non-Canonical Questions. Journal of Semantics, 39(2): 295–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffac001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Featherston, S. (2021). Response Methods in Acceptability Experiments. Dans G. Goodall (dir.), The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Syntax (p. 39–61). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569620.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fleury, D. (2021), Questions en comment de raison: La révision des attentes du locuteur [PhD]. Université de Paris/Université Paris Cité, Paris. https://u-paris.fr/theses/detail-dune-these/?id_these=3458. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fleury, D. et Tovena, L. (2018a), À propos des lectures des questions en comment. SHS Web of Conferences, 46, 12003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184612003. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fleury, D. et Tovena, L. (2018b), Reason questions with comment are expressions of an attributional search. Dans Proceedings of the 22nd Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue -Full Papers. SEMDIAL. http://semdial.org/anthology/Z18-Fleury_semdial_0015.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fliessbach, J., Brunetti, L. et Yoo, H. (under review), On the overlapping discourse functions of Spanish ‘cómo que’ and French ‘comment ça’ interrogatives. Dans H. Metslang (dir.), Open Linguistics. Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in Language. de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fontaine, J. J. R., Scherer, K. R. et Soriano, C. (dir.). (2013), Series in affective science. Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fournier, N. (1998), Grammaire du français classique. Belin SUP Lettres. Belin. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamlaoui, F. (2011), On the role of phonology and discourse in Francilian French wh-questions. Journal of Linguistics, 47(1); 129–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kédochim, F. et Guesser, S. (2020), On the readings of pourquoi in wh-questions. Revista Linguíʃtica:206–230. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kircher, R. (2016), The Matched‐Guise Technique. Dans H. Zhu (dir.), Guides to research methods in language and linguistics: Vol. 8. Research methods in intercultural communication: A practical guide: 196–211. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166283.ch13. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kohler, K. J. (2005), Timing and communicative functions of pitch contours. Phonetica, 62(2–4): 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000090091. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Korzen, H. (1990), Pourquoi pourquoi est-il différent ? L’adverbial de cause et la classification des adverbiaux en général. Langue Française, 88(1): 60–79. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1990.5753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C. et Fillenbaum, S. (1960), Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lambrecht, K. (1981), Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French. Pragmatics & beyond: 2:6. J. Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liddell, T. M. et Kruschke, J. K. (2018), Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79: 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Massot, B. et Rowlett, P. (2013), Le débat sur la diglossie en France: Aspects scientifiques et politiques Journal of French Language Studies, 23(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269512000336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Myers, L. L. et Pellet, S. (2014), Pourquoi in Spoken French: Corpus-based function-form mapping. Dans S. Katz Bourns et L. L. Myers (dir.), Pragmatics & Beyond New series: Vol. 244. Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context (Vol. 244: 157–182). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.08mye. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Osgood, C. E. (1952), The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3): 197–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055737. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Posit team. (2023), RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. http://www.posit.co/. [Google Scholar]
  33. Quillard, V. (2001), La diversité des formes interrogatives: comment l’interpréter ? Langage Et Société, 95(1): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.095.0057. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. R Core Team. (2023), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.Rproject.org/. [Google Scholar]
  35. Smirnova, A. et Abeillé, A. (2021), Question particles ça and donc in French: A corpus study. Linguistic Research, 38(2): 239–269. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sorensen, T., Hohenstein, S. et Vasishth, S. (2016), Bayesian linear mixed models using Stan: A tutorial for psychologists, linguists, and cognitive scientists. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3): 175–200. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.3175 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sullivan, G. M. et Artino, A. R. (2013), Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4): 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thiberge, G. (2020), Acquisition et maîtrise des interrogatives partielles en français: La variation sociolinguistique comme outil interactionnel [Doctoral Thesis]. Université de Paris, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tovena, L. M. (2023), Asking about the reason for an effect, and some consequences for the analysis of wh-interrogatives. Dans Ł. Jędrzejowski et C. Umbach (dir.), Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses (p. 381–409). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844620.003.0012. [Google Scholar]
  40. Trotzke, A. et Czypionka, A. (2022), The pragmatics of surprise-disapproval questions: An empirical study. Linguistics Vanguard, 8(s2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tsai, W.-T. D. (2008), Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, 83–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9021-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.