EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 203 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 203 (2024) 04001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 203, 2024
SCAN’24 - 11e Séminaire de Conception Architecturale Numérique AI & Architecture
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 18
Section Approches de conception
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420304001
Published online 13 November 2024
  1. F. Zare, K. Bazrafkan, H. Irani Behbahani, B. Mansouri, Actor-Network Theory Methodology in Architectural Co-design Process. Journal of Architectural Thought, 7 (13), 21–33 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Sadri, Introduction: Neo-liberalism and the End of the Profession of Architecture. Neoliberalism and the Architecture of the Post Professional Era, 1–5 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Awan, T. Schneider, J. Till, Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture. Abingdon, Oxon [England]; New York, NY: Routledge (2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Schneider, J. Till, Beyond discourse: Notes on spatial agency. Footprint, 97–112 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Venturini, Building on faults: How to represent controversies with digital methods. Public understanding of science, 21 (7), 796–812 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Milgram, F. Kishino, A Taxonomy Of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS On Information And Systems, 77 (12), 1321–1329 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Milgram, H. Takemura, A. Utsumi and F. Kishino, “Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum”, Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies (1995) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. R. Freitas, R. C. Ruschel, What Is Happening To Virtual And Augmented Reality Applied To Architecture. In Proceedings Of The 18th International Conference On Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research In Asia. Singapore, 407–416 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. A. Schnabel, T. Kvan, E. Kruijff, D. Donath, The first virtual environment design studio. In 19th eCAADe Conference Proceedings. Helsinki, Finland, 394–400 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Azuma, A survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6 (5), 355–385 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Ergün, S. Akın, İ. G. Dino, E. Surer, Architectural design in virtual reality and mixed reality environments: A comparative analysis. In 2019 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR) (pp. 914–915). IEEE (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Ahn, D. S. Ko, S. H. Gim, A study on the architecture of mixed reality application for architectural design collaboration. In Applied Computing and Information Technology (pp. 48–61). Springer International Publishing (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Fuchs, G. Moreau, P. Guitton, (Eds.) Virtual Reality: Concepts and Technologies. London, UK: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Dorta, Implementing and Assessing the Hybrid Ideation Space: A Cognitive Artefact for Conceptual Design. International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, 14 (2), 119–134 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Dorta, E. Pérez, A. Lesage, The Ideation Gap: Hybrid Tools, Design Flow And Practice. Design Studies, 29 (2), 121–141 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. L.F. Gül, S.M. Halici, Collaborative Design with Mobile Augmented Reality. In 34th eCAADe Conference Proceedings. Oulu, Finland 493–500 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Seichter, Benchworks Augmented Reality Urban Design. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia. Seoul; Korea, 937–946 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Schubert, B. Strobel, F. Petzold, Tangible Mixed Reality, In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia. Melbourne, Australia, 333–342 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Giddens. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press. (1984) [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Lorne. Spatial agency and practising architecture beyond buildings. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(2), 268–287. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.117428 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Strickland. The active agency of learning spaces. Learning Space Design in Higher Education. Oxfordshire: LIBRI Publishing, 209–224. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  22. www.spatialagency.net [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Cataldi, R. Abdelhamid, & F. Selva. The town of Ghardaia in M’zab, Algeria: between tradition and modernity. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 6374. (1996) [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Schneider, & J. Till. Beyond Discourse: Notes on Spatial Agency. Footprint, 97–112. (2009) https://doi.org/10.59490/footprint.3.1.702 [Google Scholar]
  25. H. Sadri. Introduction: Neo-liberalism and the End of the Profession of Architecture. Neoliberalism and the Architecture of the Post Professional Era, 1–5. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Hammond. Spatial Agency: Creating New Opportunities for Sharing and Collaboration in Older People’s Cohousing. Urban Science, 2(3), 64. (2018) https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2030064 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. B. Latour. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press. (1987) [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Law. On Sociology and STS. Sociological Review, 56(4). 623–649. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2008.00808.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Latour. On Recalling Ant. The Sociological Review, 47(1_suppl), 15–25. (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. T. Fenwick & R. Edwards. Actor-Network Theory in Education. Routledge eBooks. (2010) https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849088 [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Latour. Reassembling the Social. in Oxford eBooks University Press. (2005) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. C. Mclean & J. Hassard. Symmetrical absence/symmetrical absurdity: critical notes on the production of actor-network accounts. J Manage Stud. 41:493–519. (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. K.M. Cresswell, A. Worth, A. Sheikh. Actor-Network Theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. Medical Informatics and Decision Making. BMC. 10:67. (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Callon. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233. (1984). https://doi.org/10.1111Zj.1467-954x.1984.tb00113.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. www.VOSviewer.com. [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Mauri, T. Elli, G. Caviglia, G. Uboldi & M. Azzi. RAWGraphs: A Visualisation Platform to Create Open Outputs. In Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter (p. 28:1–28:5). New York, NY, USA: ACM. (2017) https://doi.org/10.1145/3125571.3125585 [Google Scholar]
  37. N. J. Van Eck & L. Waltman. Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.2058. (2011). https://doi.org.Z10.48550/arXiv.1109.2058 [Google Scholar]
  38. N. J. Van Eck & L. Waltman. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). Cham: Springer International Publishing. (2014).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13 [Google Scholar]
  39. www.greyandivy.ca [Google Scholar]
  40. A. B. Prado & M. C. C. Baranauskas. Addressing structural and dynamic features of scientific social networks through the lens of Actor-Network Theory. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3, 1263–1276. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. G. P. Hodgkinson & W. H. Starbuck. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making. OUP UK. (2008) [Google Scholar]
  42. F. Liu & S. Maitlis. Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: A study of strategic conversations in top team meetings. Journal of management studies, 51(2), 202–234. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  43. A. Bilodeau, M. Galarneau, C. Lefebvre & L. Potvin,. Linking process and effects of intersecto-ral action on local neighbourhoods: systemic modelling based on actornetwork-theory. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(1), 165–179 (1) (PDF) The role of Web 2.0 in collaborative design: an ANT perspective. (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.