EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 214 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 214 (2025) 01013 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2025
CIFEM’2024 - 4e édition du Colloque International sur la Formation et l’Enseignement des Mathématiques et des Sciences & Techniques
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521401013
Published online 28 March 2025
  1. Orientations pour l’intelligence artificielle générative dans l’éducation et la recherche. UNESCO, 2024. DOI: 10.54675/HBCX3851. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Collin, A. Lepage, and L. Nebel, “Enjeux éthiques et critiques de l’intelligence artificielle en éducation: une revue systématique de la littérature,” Can. J. Learn. Technol., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1–29, Feb. 2024, DOI: 10.21432/cjlt28448. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Lepage and N. Roy, “Une recension des écrits de 1970 à 2022 sur les rôles de l’enseignant et de l’intelligence artificielle dans le domaine de l’IA en éducation,” Médiations Médiatisations, no. 16, pp. 9–29, Oct. 2023, DOI: 10.52358/mm.vi16.304. [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Holmes and K. Porayska-Pomsta, The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Practices, Challenges, and Debates, 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2022. DOI: 10.4324/9780429329067. [Google Scholar]
  5. CEU. EAC_1., Lignes directrices éthiques sur l’utilisation de l’intelligence artificielle (IA) et des données dans l’enseignement et l’apprentissage à l’intention des éducateurs. LU: Publications Office, 2022. Accessed: Mar. 17, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/394434 [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Laurillard, Teaching as a design science: building pedagogical patterns for leaning and technology. New York, NY Abingdon: Routledge, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Habib, T. Vogel, X. Anli, and E. Thorne, “How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity?,” J. Creat., vol. 34, no. 1, p. 100072, Apr. 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Buenaño-Fernández, D. Gil, and S. Luján-Mora, “Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Performance for Computer Engineering Students: A Case Study,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 2833, Ma. 2019, DOI: 10.3390/su11102833. [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Cooper, “Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 444–452, Jul. 2023, DOI: 10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Alneyadi and Y. Wardat, “ChatGPT: Revolutionizing student achievement in the electronic magnetism unit for eleventh-grade students in Emirates schools,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 15, no. 4, p. ep448, Oct. 2023, DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/13417. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. M. Koć-Januchta, K. J. Schönborn, L. A. E. Tibell, V. K. Chaudhri, and H. C. Heller, “Engaging With Biology by Asking Questions: Investigating Students’ Interaction and Learning With an Artificial Intelligence-Enriched Textbook,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1190–1224, Oct. 2020, DOI: 10.1177/0735633120921581. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. P. Siddaway, A. M. Wood, and L. V. Hedges, “How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, MetaAnalyses, and Meta-Syntheses,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 747–770, Jan. 2019, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y.-F. Lee, G.-J. Hwang, and P.-Y. Chen, “Impacts of an AI-based chabot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1843–1865, Oct. 2022, DOI: 10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Azcona, I.-H. Hsiao, and A. F. Smeaton, “Detecting students-at-risk in computer programming classes with learning analytics from students’ digital footprints,” User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 759–788, Sep. 2019, DOI: 10.1007/s11257-019-09234-7. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Herdliska and X. Zhai, “Artificial Intelligence-based Scientific Inquiry,” SSRN Electron. J., 2023, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4591628. [Google Scholar]
  16. X. Zhai, “ChatGPT for Next Generation Science Learning,” XRDS Crossroads ACM Mag. Stud., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 42–46, Mar. 2023, DOI: 10.1145/3589649. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Hutson, “Hypotheses devised by AI could find ‘blind spots’ in research,” Nature, pp. d41586-023-03596-0, 2023, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-03596-0. [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Wang et al., “Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence,” Nature, vol. 620, no. 7972, pp. 47–60, Aug. 2023, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2. [Google Scholar]
  19. H. B. Essel, D. Vlachopoulos, A. Tachie-Menson, E. E. Johnson, and P. K. Baah, “The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 57, Nov. 2022, DOI: 10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6. [Google Scholar]
  20. A.-Z. Abdulrahman, “From Traditionalism to Algorithms: Embracing Artificial Intelligence for Effective University Teaching and Learning,” IgMin Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 102–112, Feb. 2024, DOI: 10.61927/igmin151. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. M. Al-Zahrani, “The impact of generative AI tools on researchers and research: Implications for academia in higher education,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1029–1043, Sep. 2024, DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2271445. [Google Scholar]
  22. C.-P. Dai and F. Ke, “Educational applications of artificial intelligence in simulation-based learning: A systematic mapping review,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 3, p. 100087, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100087. [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Creely and J. Blannin, “Creative partnerships with generative ai. possibilities for education and beyond,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 56, p. 101727, Jun. 2025, DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101727. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.