EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 232 (2026) SHS Web Conf., 232 (2026) 10003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2026
10e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 10003
Number of page(s) 15
Section Psycholinguistique et acquisition
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623210003
Published online 15 June 2026
  1. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1‑4), 3–38. [Google Scholar]
  2. Colozzo, P., & Whitely, C. (2015). The interplay of referential function and character primacy on referring expressions in children’s narratives. First Language, 35(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723715577321 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dupret, C. (2022). Le développement de la référence en récit à l’âge préscolaire et scolaire : Une analyse multifactorielle [Thèse de doctorat, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle]. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hickmann, M., Schimke, S., & Colonna, S. (2015). From early to late mastery of reference : Multifunctionality and linguistic diversity. In L. Serratrice & S. E. M. Allen (eds.), The acquisition of reference (p. 181–211). John Benjamins Publishing Company. [Google Scholar]
  5. Serratrice, L. (2008). The Role of Discourse and Perceptual Cues in the Choice of Referential Expressions in English Preschoolers, School-Age Children, and Adults. Language Learning and Development, 4(4), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440802333619 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonin, P., Gelin, M., & Bugaiska, A. (2014). Animates are better remembered than inanimates : Further evidence from word and picture stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0368-8 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bugaiska, A., Bonin, P., & Witt, A. (2023). Do young children, like young adults, remember animates better than inanimates? Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1141540 [Google Scholar]
  8. Rawlinson, H. C., & Kelley, C. M. (2021). In search of the proximal cause of the animacy effect on memory: Attentional resource allocation and semantic representations. Memory & Cognition, 49(6), 1137–1152. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01154-5 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hickmann, M., Kail, M., & Roland, F. (1995). Organisation référentielle dans les récits d’enfants en fonction des contraintes contextuelles. Enfance, 48(2), 215–226. Philadelphia, PA/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  10. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). A Functional Approach to Child Language: A Study of Determiners and Reference. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bishop, D. V. M. (2017). Why is it so hard to reach agreement on terminology? The case of developmental language disorder (DLD): Terminology and the case of DLD. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52(6), 671–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12335 [Google Scholar]
  12. Parisse, C., & Maillart, C. (2007). Phonology and syntax in French children with SLI : A longitudinal study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21(11‑12), 945–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200701610634 [Google Scholar]
  13. Davies, C., Andrés-Roqueta, C., & Norbury, C. F. (2016). Referring expressions and structural language abilities in children with specific language impairment: A pragmatic tolerance account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 144, 98–113. [Google Scholar]
  14. de Weck, G. (2004). Les troubles pragmatiques et discursifs dans la dysphasie. Enfance, 56(1), 91–106. [Google Scholar]
  15. Purcell, S. L., & Liles, B. Z. (1992). Cohesion Repairs in the Narratives of Normal-Language and Language-Disordered School-Age Children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 35(2), 354–362. [Google Scholar]
  16. Salazar Orvig, A., de Weck, G., Basselier, M., & Henry, A. (2007). Dialogue entre enfants dysphasiques et leur mère : Analyse des processus d’ajustement. Rééducation Orthophonique, 230, 25‑45. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bellifemine, C. (2022). Multimodalité, Complexité, Syntaxe : Intégration des gestes dans le discours d’enfants à développement typique et avec trouble du développement du langage [Thèse de doctorat, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle]. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kern, S. (1997). Comment les enfants jonglent avec les contraintes communicationnelles, discursives et linguistiques dans la production d’une narration [Thèse de doctorat, Université Lumière - Lyon II]. [Google Scholar]
  19. de Weck, G. (1991). La cohésion dans les textes d’enfants. Étude du développement des processus anaphoriques. Neuchâtel : Delachaux et Niestlé. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mazur-Palandre, A., & Jisa, H. (2012). Introduire et développer l’information : Une acquisition tardive ? CogniTextes. Revue de l’Association française de linguistique cognitive, 7. https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.597 [Google Scholar]
  21. Arnold, J. E., & Griffin, Z. M. (2007). The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression : Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fossard, M., Achim, A. M., Rousier-Vercruyssen, L., Gonzalez, S., Bureau, A., & Champagne-Lavau, M. (2018). Referential choices in a collaborative storytelling task: Discourse stages and referential complexity matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00176 [Google Scholar]
  23. Serratrice, L. (2013). The role of number of referents and animacy in children’s use of pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 31‑42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.008 [Google Scholar]
  24. Schneider, P., & Dubé, R. (1997). Effect of pictorial versus oral story presentation on children’s use of referring expressions in retell. First Language, 17(51), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379701705113 [Google Scholar]
  25. Chastain, C. (1975). Reference and Context. In K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge (Vol. 7, p. 194–269). University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Schiborr, N. N. (2023). Lexical anaphora: A corpus-based typological study of referential choice. University of Bamberg Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Schnedecker, C. (2019). De l’intérêt de la notion de chaîne de référence par rapport à celles d’anaphore et de coréférence. Cahiers de praxématique, 72. https://doi.org/10.4000/praxematique.5339 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ariel, M. (1991). The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(5), 443–463. [Google Scholar]
  29. Givón, T. (1995). Coherence in text vs. Coherence in mind. In M. A. Gernsbacher & T. Givón (eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text (p. 59–116). Philadelphia, PA/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kibrik, A. A. (2011). Reference in Discourse. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Aksu-Koç, A., & Nicolopoulou, A. (2015). Character reference in young children’s narratives : A crosslinguistic comparison of English, Greek, and Turkish. Lingua, 155, 62‑84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  32. Bamberg, M. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships. 24(1), 227–284. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lindgren, J., & Vogels, J. (2018). Referential cohesion in Swedish preschool children’s narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 133, 45‑62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nicolopoulou, A., & Richner, E. S. (2007). From Actors to Agents to Persons : The Development of Character Representation in Young Children’s Narratives. Child Development, 78(2), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01006.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Royle, P., & Reising, L. (2019). Elicited and spontaneous determiner phrase production in French-speaking children with developmental language disorder. Canadian journal of speech-language pathology and audiology. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rice, M. L., & Oetting, J. B. (1993). Morphological deficits of children with SLI: Evaluation of number marking and agreement. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(6), 1249–1257. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3606.1249 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rezzonico, S., Vinel, E., De Weck, G., Hassan, R., & Salagnac, N. (2021). Referring in dialogical narratives : A study on children’s use of nouns and pronouns. In A. Salazar-Orvig, G. de Weck, R. Hassan, & A. Rialland (eds.), The acquisition of referring expressions : A dialogical approach (p. 116–139). Philadelphia, PA/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  38. Leonard, L. B., Eyer, J. A., Bedore, L. M., & Grela, B. G. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(4), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4004.741 [Google Scholar]
  39. Polite, E. J., Leonard, L.B., & Roberts, F. D. (2011). The use of definite and indefinite articles by children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.558116 [Google Scholar]
  40. Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children's production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 99–127. doi:10.1017/S0305000907008276 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Moscati, V., Rizzi, L., Vottari, I., Chilosi, A. M., Salvadorini, R., & Guasti, M. T. (2020). Morphosyntactic weaknesses in developmental language disorder: The role of structure and agreement configurations. Journal of Child Language, 47(5), 909–944. doi:10.1017/S0305000919000709 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stanford, E., & Delage, H. (2020). Executive functions and morphosyntax: Distinguishing DLD from ADHD in French-speaking children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 551824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551824 [Google Scholar]
  43. Veneziano, E. (2010). Peut-on aider l'enfant à mieux raconter ? Les effets de différentes méthodes d'intervention. Dans H. Makdissi, A. Boisclair & P. Sirois (Éds.), La littératie au préscolaire : une fenêtre ouverte sur la scolarisation (p.107–144), Presses Universitaires du Québec. [Google Scholar]
  44. Schelletter, C., & and Leinonen, E. (2003). Normal and Language‐impaired children’s use of reference : Syntactic versus pragmatic processing. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17(4‑5), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269920031000080000 [Google Scholar]
  45. Schneider, P., & Hayward, D. (2010). Who Does What to Whom: Introduction of Referents in Children’s Storytelling From Pictures. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(4), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0040) [Google Scholar]
  46. Dickinson, K. V., Ortiz-Ramírez, P. A., Arrieta-Zamudio, A., Grinstead, J., & Flores-Ávalos, B. (2023). Overt Subject Pronoun Use in Switch-Reference Contexts in Child Spanish Developmental Language Disorder: A Discriminant Function Analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66(2), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00483 [Google Scholar]
  47. Fichman, S., Walters, J., Melamed, R., & Altman, C. (2022). Reference to characters in narratives of Russian-Hebrew bilingual and Russian and Hebrew monolingual children with Developmental Language Disorder and typical language development. First Language, 42(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723720962938 [Google Scholar]
  48. de Weck, G., & Jullien, S. (2013). How do French-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment first mention a referent in storytelling? Between reference and grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 56, 70‑87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  49. Khomsi, A. (2001). ELO : Evaluation du Langage Oral. Paris : Éditions ECPA. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bellifemine, C. (2023). Complexité syntaxique multimodale dans les récits d’enfants à développement typique et avec trouble spécifique du langage. TRANEL, 78(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.26034/ne.tranel.2023.3641 [Google Scholar]
  51. Bellifemine, C., & Dupret, C. (2023). Référence multimodale dans les narrations d’enfants : Les gestes servent-ils à clarifier les expressions référentielles ambiguës ? Discours, 32. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.12466 [Google Scholar]
  52. Colletta, J.-M. (2004). Le développement de la parole chez l’enfant âgé de 6 à 11 ans : Corps, langage et cognition. Sprimont : Éditions Mardaga. [Google Scholar]
  53. de Weck, G. (1993). Langage déviant et orthophonie : l’exemple des dysphasies. TRANEL, 20, 69‑87. [Google Scholar]
  54. Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View. In C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic (25–55). New York – San Francisco – London: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  55. Vogels, J. (2014). Referential Choices in Language Production: The Role of Accessibility. [PhD Dissertation. Center for Cognition and Communication, Tilburg University. Tilbourg]. [Google Scholar]
  56. Fukumura, K., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2011). The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1472–1504. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.506444 [Google Scholar]
  57. Da Silva, C. (2014). Étude des processus de rééducation dans le cas des troubles spécifiques du développement du langage [Thèse de doctorat, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle-Université de Neuchâtel]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.