EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 26 (2016) SHS Web of Conferences, 26 (2016) 01066 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 26, 2016
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2015 (ERPA 2015)
Article Number 01066
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601066
Published online 26 April 2016
  1. Akbıyık, C & Ay, Kalkan, Okul, G. Öncesi Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerin Düşünme Becerilerinin Oğretimine Yönelik Algıları: Bir Durum Çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 29(1).01–18 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. Akkoç, H., Uygulama Toplulukları Çerçevesinin Okul Deneyimi Dersine Entegrasyonu: Bilgisayar Destekli Matematik Öğretimi Etkinliği Örneği 2. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Sempozyumu (Türkbilmat-2). Adıyaman, Türkiye (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. Bingölbali, E. & Monaghan, J., Identity, knowledge and departmental practices: mathematics of engineers and mathematicians. 28th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME). Vol. 2. 127-134 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  4. Booth, R. D. L., & Thomas, M. O. J., Visualization in mathematics learning: Arithmetic problem solving and student difficulties. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, 169–190 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chindgren-Wagner, T. M., Examining the relationship between communities of practice and climate of ınnovation in the u.s. federal government environment. Falls Church, Virginia (2009) [Google Scholar]
  6. Delice, A. & Ergene, Ö., İntegral Hacim Problemleri Çözüm Süreçlerinin Bireysel İlişkiler Bağlamında İncelenmesi; Disk, Pul Ve Kabuk Yöntemleri. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5/1. ss. 37-54 (2015a) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Delice, A. & Ergene, Ö., Investigation of Drawings and Rotation Skills in Integral Volume Problems Solving Process Within Communities Of Practices. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education.11(4) pp.1288-1309, ISSN:1304-9496 (2015b) [Google Scholar]
  8. Delice, A. & Sür, B., İkiyüzlü Matematiksel Kelimeler. International Journal of Human Science, 12(1), 831850 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. Delice, A. & Yılmaz, K., 10. Sınıf öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin matematik problem çözme süreçlerinin incelemesi: Bilgibilimsel İnanç. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. Sayı 30. Cilt -sf 85-102 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  10. Erden, M. & Akınan, Y., Eğitim psikolojisi: Gelişim, öğrenme, öğretme. Arkadaş Yayınlan (1985) [Google Scholar]
  11. Ergene, Ö., İntegral hacim problemleri çözüm sürecindeki bireysel ilişkilerin uygulama topluluğu bağlamında incelenmesi (Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi (2014) [Google Scholar]
  12. González-Martín, A.S., Students’ personal relationship with series of real numbers as a consequence of teaching practices. Proceedings of the 8th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME8). Antalya (Türkiye) (2013a) [Google Scholar]
  13. Gonzelez-Martín, A.S., Students’ personal relationship with the convergence of series of real numbers as a consequence of teaching practices. Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany: PME, vol. 2, pp. 361–368 (2013b) [Google Scholar]
  14. Goos, M. E. & Bennison, J. A., Developing a communal identity as beginning teachers of mathematics: emergence of an online community of practice.Math.Teacher Education, 11,41–60 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S., Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin ve, N. Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, Sag Publications (1994) [Google Scholar]
  16. Haciömeroğlu, G. & Hacıömeroğlu, E.S., Matematik İşlem Testi’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlama Çalışması: Öğretmen Adaylarının Matematik Problemlerini Çözme Tercihlerinin İncelenmesi, Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, cilt.6, ss.196-213 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  17. Hepner, P.P. & Anderson, W.P., “The relationship betwccn problem solving selfappraisal & psychological adjustmcnt.” CognitiveTherapy and Research. 4. 415-427 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., Buchman, A. D., & Sczesniak, E., Mathematical problem solving in third-grade classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 282–302 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kıray, S.A. ve İlik A., Polya’nın problem çözme yönteminin fen bilgisi öğretiminde kullanılmasına yönelik bir çalışma: kanıt temelli uygulamaya doğru. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31,183–202 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. Kilpatrick, J., Research on problem solving in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics. 78(3), 189–192 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  21. Laksov, K. B., Mann, S. & Dahlgren, O. L., Developing a community of practice around teaching: A case study. Higher Education Research & Development Vol. 27, No. 2, 121–132 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lave, J. & Wenger, E., Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı (MEB), Ortaöğretim matematik (9,10,11 ve 12) sınıflar dersi öğretim programı, Ankara (2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. Moule, L., Developing the communities of practice, framework for on-line learning. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 4 Issue 2, pp 133–140 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  25. Montague, M., Krawec, J., Enders, C., & Dietz, S., The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem-solving of middle school students of varying ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 469-481. doi: 10.1037/a0035176 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oberg, R., An investigation of undee graudate calculus students understanding of the definite intgeral, Unpublished EdD. The Univesity of Montana (2000) [Google Scholar]
  27. Probst, G. & Borzillo, S., Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal. 26, 335–347 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rasslan, S. & Tall, D., Definitions and ımages for the definite ıntegral concept. In Cockburn, A., Nardi, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th PME, 4, 89-96 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  29. Paul, H. & Robinson., Community treatment of eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review. Volume 15, Issue 4, page 321 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Robutti, O., Real and virtual calculator: from measurements to definite ıntegral European Research in Mathematics Education III (2003) [Google Scholar]
  31. Sevimli, E., Matematik öğretmen adaylarının belirli integral konusundaki temsil tercihlerinin uzamsal yetenek ve akademik başarı bağlamında incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul (2009) [Google Scholar]
  32. Thompson, P., Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics,26 (2), 229–274 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thompson, P. W. ve Silverman, J., The concept of accumulation in calculus. In Carlson ve, M. Rasmussen, C. (Eds.), Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics, 117-131 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  34. Wenger, E., Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge University Press, New York. 17 (2008) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.