Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 26, 2016
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2015 (ERPA 2015)
Article Number 01078
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601078
Published online 26 April 2016
  1. DeLamater, W. E., How Larger Font Size Impacts Reading and the Implications for Educational Use of Digital Text Readers. [online] [cit. 2015-01-27] available from: http://www.ereadia.com/research/How_Larger_Font_Size_Affects_Reading.pdf, (2010).
  2. Felcmanová, L., Test zrakového vnímání (Testing visual perception). Praha: DYScentrum, ISBN 978-80-87581-02-5, (2013).
  3. Jošt, J., Čtení a dyslexie (Reading and dyslexia). Praha: Grada, ISBN 978-802-4730-301, (2011).
  4. Matějček, Z. a kol., Zkouška čtení (Reading test). Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika, (1992).
  5. Stein, J., Visual motion sensitivity and reading. [online] [cit. 2015-06-21] available from: http://www.google.cz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDkQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F5588563_Visual_motion_sensitivity_and_reading%2Ffile%2F79e4150f26e7d03dcd.pdf&ei=0ZkQU_6nMero7Ab--IGgDw&usg=AFQjCNGtXX33vScM68mcM8YOhXBxpxRJAQ&bvm=bv.61965928,d.ZGU, (2003).
  6. Stein, J., Walsh, V., To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. [online] [cit. 2015-06-21] available from: http://www.2020true.com/office/box_b/documents/A0002.pdf, (1997).
  7. The Effect of Font Size on Reading Comprehension on Second and Fifth Grade Children: Bigger Is Not Always Better. [online] 2013 [cit. 2015-01-27] available from: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0074061
  8. Zelinková, O., Poruchy učení (Learning disabilities) Praha: Portál, ISBN 80-7178-800-7, (2003).
  9. Zikl, P., Košek Bartošová, I., Josefová Víšková, K., et al., The Possibilities Of ICT Use For Compensation Of Difficulties With Reading In Pupils With Dyslexia. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. [online] [cit. 2015-01-27] Volume 176, p. 915–922, available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/18770428/176, (2015). [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.