Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 37, 2017
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2017 (ERPA 2017)
Article Number 01033
Number of page(s) 17
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173701033
Published online 14 August 2017
  1. Açıkgöz Ün, K.(2003). Etkili öğrenme ve öğretme. İzmir: Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahuja, M. K., (2002). Women in the information technology profession: A literature review, synthesis and research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(1), 20–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aldağ H. ve Tekdal M. (2015). Bilgisayar Kullanımı ve Programlama Öğretiminde Cinsiyet Farklılıkları, 1. Uluslararası Çukurova Kadın Çalışmaları Kongresi, ADANA, TÜRKİYE, 9-11 Nisan 2015, pp.236–243. [Google Scholar]
  4. Behrend, T. S., Wiebe, E. N., London, J. E., and Johnson, E. C. (2011). Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 231–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruner, C., (1991). Ten questions and answers to help policy makers improve children’s services. Washington, DC: Education and Human Services Consortium. [Google Scholar]
  6. Buyukozturk, S., Kilic Cakmak, E., Akgun, O., Karadeniz, S., ve Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
  7. Calvo, R. A., O’Rourke, S. T., Jones, J., Yacef, K., and Reimann, P. (2011). Collaborative writing support tools on the cloud. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 88–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 320–334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dinh, H. T., Lee, C., Niyato, D., and Wang, P. (2013). A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches. Wireless communications and mobile computing, 13(18), 1587–1611 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ercan, T. (2010). Effective use of cloud computing in educational institutions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 938–942. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, C. E., and Dietz, E. J. (1995). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal Of Engineering Education–Washington, 84, 151–164. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fylaktopoulos, G., Goumas, G., Skolarikis, M., Sotiropoulos, A., and Maglogiannis, I. (2016). An overview of platforms for cloud based development. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guzdial, M., Ludovice, P., Realff, M., Morley, T., Carroll, K., and Ladak, A. (2001). The challenge of collaborative learning in engineering and math. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual (Vol. 1, pp. T3B-24). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  14. Holschuh, D. R., and Caverly, D. C. (2010). Techtalk: Cloud Computing and Developmental Education. Journal of Developmental Education, 33(3), 38–39. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, W. H. D., Hood, D. W., and Yoo, S. J. (2013). Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 57–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang Y.M., Wang C.S., Guo J.Z., Shih HY and Chen Y.S. (2013). Advancing collaborative learning with cloud service. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 253, 717–722. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang, Y. M., Wang, C. S., and Liu, Y. C. (2015) “A Study of Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Collaborative Design in Students Learning Motivation”.International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(5), 354–357. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, B. and Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches 4th edition, Sage: USA. [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, D., Johnson, R. ve Smith, K. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (4). Washington, DC: The George Washington University. [Google Scholar]
  20. Layman, L. (2006) “Changing Students’ Perceptions: An Analysis of the Supplementary Benefits of Collaborative Software Development, “ Proc. 19th. IEEE Conf. Software Eng. Education and Training, 159–166. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lawton, G. (2008). Developing software online with platform-as-a-service technology. Computer, 41(6), 13–15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. Levin, S. (2013), “Synchronized software development,” http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/thesis/thesis/Levin.Stas-MSc.pdf adresinden 29.05.2016 tarihinde erişildi. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liao, J., Wang, M., Ran, W., and Yang, S. J. (2014). Collaborative cloud: a new model for e-learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(3), 338–351 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lin, A., and Chen, N.-C. (2012). Cloud computing as an innovation: Percepetion, attitude, and adoption. International Journal of Information Management, 32(6), 533–540. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Murah, M. Z. (2012). Teaching and learning cloud computing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 157–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nordio, M., Estler, H., Furia, C. A., and Meyer, B. (2011). Collaborative software development on the web. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pike, R. E., Pittman, J. M., Hwang, D., and Pomona, C. A. (2016). Cloud-based Versus Local-based Web Development Education: An Experimental Study in Learning Experience. In Proceedings of the EDSIG Conference ISSN (Vol. 2473, p. 3857).. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rajaei, H. and Aldakheel, E. A. (2012). Cloud computing in computer science and engineering education, American Society for Engineering Education. [Google Scholar]
  29. Robillard, P. N., and Robillard, M. P. (2000). Types of collaborative work in software engineering. Journal of Systems and Software, 53(3), 219–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Siegle, D. (2010). Cloud Computing: A Free Technology Option to Promote Collaborative Learning. Gifted Child Today, 33(4), 41–45. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Revıew Of Educatıonal Research. 50(2), 315–342. [Google Scholar]
  32. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48, 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  33. Stevenson, M., and Hedberg, J. G. (2013). Learning and design with online real-time collaboration. Educational Media International, 50(2), 120–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stump, G. S., Hilpert, J. C., Husman, J., Chung, W. T., and Kim, W. (2011). Collaborative learning in engineering students: Gender and achievement. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 475–497. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sultan, N. (2010). Cloud computing for education: A new dawn?. International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 109–116. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thomas, P. Y. (2011). Cloud computing: A potential paradigm for practising the scholarship of teaching and learning. The Electronic Library, 29(2), 214–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vaquero, L. M. (2011). EduCloud: PaaS versus IaaS cloud usage for an advanced computer science course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(4), 590–598. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, C. S., Huang, Y. M., and Huang, Y. M. (2012). Interactive e-Learning with Cloud Computing Framework. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 182, 311–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Williams, L. A., and Kessler, R. R. (2000). The effects of “pair-pressure” and “pairlearning” on software engineering education, 13th Conference on Software Engineering Education, 59–65. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wright, J. C. (1996). Authentic learning environment in analytical chemistry using cooperative methods and open-ended laboratories in large lecture courses. J. Chem. Educ, 73(9), 827. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.