Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 37, 2017
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2017 (ERPA 2017)
Article Number 01039
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173701039
Published online 14 August 2017
  1. Şenel Çoruhlu, T., & Çepni, S. Effects of the enriched 5E model on students’ conceptual change: Astronomy sample. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(4), 1785–1802, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  2. Açışlı, S., Turgut, Ü., Altun Yalçın, S., & Gürbüz, F. (2009). Elektrik konusunda 5E öğrenme modeline dayalı öğretimin üniversite öğrencilerinin bilimsel işlem becerilerine ve fizik laboratuvarına karşı tutumlarına etkisi. Bayburt Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 4(I-II), 80–92, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  3. Demir, S. Bilimsel tartışma ve araştırmaya dayalı tasarlanan laboratuvar programının, fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel yaratıcılıklarına etkisi. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Education Sciences, İstanbul. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F., Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, T.C., Peng, H., Wu, W., & Lin, M. S. The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 344–358, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  6. Champbell, M. A. The effects of the 5E learning cycle model on students’ understanding of force and motion concepts. Unpublished master thesis, B. S. Millersville University, Orlondo, Florida. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  7. Martin, D.J. Elementary science methods, a constructivist approach. Belmont: Thomson Learning Academic Resource Center. 4 Edition. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  8. Köseoğlu, F., & Tümay, H. Bilim eğitiminde yapılandırıcı paradigma teoriden öğretim uygulamalarına. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, P. H., Yang, Y. T. C., Chang, S. H. G., & Kuo, F. R. R. 5E mobile inquiry learning approach for enhancing learning motivation and scientific inquiry ability of university students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(2), 147–153, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Demirhan İşcan, C., & Keleşoğlu, S. Practices of prospective teachers based on constructivism. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(3), 1055–1070, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. Kırıktaş, H., & Ünal Çoban, G. Effects of multiple intelligence based inquiry practices on critical thinking and academic achievement of preservice teachers. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37, 69–88, (2016). ISSN:1302–8944 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.