Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 38, 2017
Connaissances et Usages en L2 / Knowledge and Usage in L2
Article Number 00002
Number of page(s) 19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173800002
Published online 01 December 2017
  1. R Core Team. (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  2. Team Audacity. (2013). Audacity version 2.0.3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andringa, S., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). New directions in the study of implicit and explicit learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37 (Special Issue 02), 185–196. http://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500008X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singmann, H., Green, P. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4: Version 1.1-9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2007). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05). [Google Scholar]
  6. Bond, K., Gabriele, A., Fiorentino, R., & Alemán Bañon, J. (2011). Individual Differences and the Role of the L1 in L2 Processing: An ERP Investigation. In D. Tanner & J. Herschensohn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2011), (pp. 17–29). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. [Google Scholar]
  7. Carhart, R., & Jerger, J. (1959). Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 24(November), 330–345. http://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.2404.330 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, L., Shu, H., Liu, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject–verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(2), 161–174. http://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890700291X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. [Google Scholar]
  10. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. N. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  11. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. http://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, N. C. (2005). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 63–103). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781405132817.2005.00005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages (pp. 79–114). London: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Event-Related Brain Potentials: Methods, Theory, and Applications. In Handbook of Psychophysiology (pp. 85–119). http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546396.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferragne, E., Flavier, S., & Fressard, C. (2012). ROCme! Recording of Oral Corpora Made Easy, version 2.1.04. Available at http://www.ddl.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/Download/Index.asp?Langue=FR&Page=ROCme [Google Scholar]
  16. Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78–84. http://doi.org/S1364661300018398 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2003). Language Background Questionnaire. Developed in The Dynamics of Multilingual Processing. Nijmegen, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194–205. http://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563328 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Processing a second language: late learners’ comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 123–141. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000232 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(2), 159–201. http://doi.org/10.1080/016909600386084 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models: Version 2.0-33. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lenth, R. (2016). lsmeans: Least-Squares Means: Version 2.25. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). [Google Scholar]
  24. Lopez-Calderón, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: an opensource toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 213. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213 [Google Scholar]
  25. Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. http://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Meulman, N., Stowe, L. A., Sprenger, S. A., Bresser, M., & Schmid, M. S. (2014). An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail? Frontiers in Psychology, 5(SEP). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01072 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mueller, J. L. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing. Second Language Research, 21(2), 152–174. http://doi.org/10.1191/0267658305sr256oa [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Neurobehavioral Systems. (2012). Presentation. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005). An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1212–1228. http://doi.org/10.1162/0898929055002436 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The Assessment and Analysis of Handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. http://doi.org/doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ping Li, S. S. (2006). Language history questionnaire: A web-based interface for bilingual research. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 202–10. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192770 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., Hasting, A. S., & Carlyon, R. P. (2008). Syntax as a reflex: Neurophysiological evidence for early automaticity of grammatical processing. Brain and Language, 104(3), 244–253. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.05.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2013). Implicit learning in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The Impact of Proficiency on Syntactic Second-language Processing of German and Italian: Evidence from Event-related Potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(12), 2030–2048. http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.12.2030 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L. A. (2008). Second language processing: when are first and second languages processed similarly? Second Language Research, 24(3), 397–430. http://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308090186 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Segalowitz, N. B. J. B. N.-C. M. (2004). A Comparison of Spanish Second Language Acquisition in Two Different Learning Contexts: Study Abroad and the Domestic Classroom. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, FirstView, 1–17. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000370 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tanner, D., Mclaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (Special Issue 02), 367–382. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000302 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tanner, J., Wilson, P., & Swets, J. A. (1954). A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychological Review, 61(6), 401–409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. The Mathworks. (2008). MATLAB and statistics toolbox. Massachusetts, USA: INC. Natick. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and Explicit Measures of Sensitivity to Violations in Second Language Grammar: An Event-Related Potential Investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 173–204. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050102 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tremblay, A., & Ransijn, J. (2015). LMERConvenienceFunctions: Model Selection and Post-hoc Analysis for (G)LMER Models. [Google Scholar]
  43. Trudgill, P. (2001). Modern East Anglia as a dialect area. In J. Fisiak & P. Trudgill (Eds.), East Anglian English (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: D.S. Brewer. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(10), 717–726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26(1), 43–74. http://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309337637 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.