Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 41, 2018
International Conference on Architectural Education in Asia (eduARCHsia 2017)
Article Number 05002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Digital Reality and Digital Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184105002
Published online 10 January 2018
  1. Allen, S. (1997). Object to Field. In M. Toy (Ed.), Architecture After Geometry (Vol. 67). Academy Press.
  2. Beorkrem, C. (2013). Material strategies in digital fabrication. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  3. Christenson, M. (2009). Testing the Relevance of Parameterization to Architectural Epistemology. Architectural Science Review, 52(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2009.0022 [CrossRef]
  4. Christenson, M. (2016). Beginning design technology. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  5. Corazza, S. (2012). Modelling Techniques-Differences between NURBS and Polygon. Retrieved October 3, 2017, from https://seraphinacorazza.wordpress.com/2012/12/28/modeling-techniques-differences-between-nurbs-andpolygon-modelling-new-york-city-rooftop-3darchitecture-project-research/
  6. Derix, C., & Izaki, A. (2014). New Curricula: Syntonic Systems. Architectural Design, 84(5), 122–129. [CrossRef]
  7. Eisenman, P. (2015). Architecture After the Age of Printing (1992). In M. Carpo (Ed.), The Digital Turn in Architecture 1992-2012 (pp. 15–27). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118795811.ch1
  8. Emmer, M. (2005). Mathland: The Role of Mathematics in Virtual Architecture. Nexus Network Journal, 7(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-005-0023-1 [CrossRef]
  9. Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2. ed. [updated and expanded]). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  10. Jeong, Y.-S., Eastman, C. M., Sacks, R., & Kaner, I. (2009). Benchmark tests for BIM data exchanges of precast concrete. Automation in Construction, 18(4), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.11.001 [CrossRef]
  11. Kay, A. (2012). The Future of Reading Depends on the Future of Learning Difficult-to-Learn Things. In B. Junge, C. Zwick, & Kunsthochschule Berlin-Weißensee (Eds.), The digital turn: design in the era of interactive technologies. Zürich: Park books.
  12. Kolarevic, B. (Ed.). (2003). Architecture in the digital age: design and manufacturing. New York, NY: Spon Press.
  13. Legendre, G. L. (Ed.). (2011). Mathematics of space. London: Wiley.
  14. Loo, S. (2013). Abstract Care. In H. Frichot & S. Loo (Eds.), Deleuze and architecture (pp. 245–261). Edinburgh University Press.
  15. Parisi, L. (2013). Contagious architecture: computation, aesthetics, and space. Cambridge, Massachusetts l London, England: The MIT Press.
  16. Picon, A. (2003). Architecture and the virtual: towards a new materiality? Retrieved from https://e-pub.uniweimar. de/opus4/files/1236/picon.pdf
  17. Robbins, E., & Cullinan, E. (1994). Why architects draw. MIT press.
  18. Scheer, D. R. (2014). The death of drawing: architecture in the age of simulation. London; New York: Routledge.
  19. Woodbury, R. (2010). Elements of parametric design. London; New York, NY: Routledge.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.