Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 102, 2021
The 3rd ETLTC International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ETLTC2021)
Article Number 04014
Number of page(s) 7
Section Applications in Computer Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110204014
Published online 03 May 2021
  1. Andrew Ettles, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and Paul Denny. 2018. Common logic errors made by novice programmers. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brett A. Becker. 2016. An Effective Approach to Enhancing Compiler Error Messages. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 126–131. [Google Scholar]
  3. Paul Denny, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, and Ewan Tempero. 2012. All Syntax Errors Are Not Equal. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  4. Raymond S. Pettit, John Homer, and Roger Gee. 2017. Do Enhanced Compiler Error Messages Help Students? Results Inconclusive. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 465–470. [Google Scholar]
  5. James Prather, Raymond Pettit, Kayla Holcomb McMurry, Alani Peters, John Homer, Nevan Simone, and Maxine Cohen. 2017. On Novices’ Interaction with Compiler Error Messages: A Human Factors Approach. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
  6. Md.Mostafizer Rahman, Yutaka Watanobe, and Keita Nakamura. 2020. A Neural Network Based Intelligent Support Model for Program Code Completion. Scientific Programming, Vol. 2020, Article ID 7426461, 18 pages. [Google Scholar]
  7. Md.Mostafizer Rahman, Yutaka Watanobe, and Keita Nakamura. 2020. Source Code Assessment and Classification Based on Estimated Error Probability Using Attentive LSTM Language Model and Its Application in Programming Education. Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, no. 8: 2973. [Google Scholar]
  8. Md.Mostafizer Rahman, Yutaka Watanobe, and Keita Nakamura. 2021. A Bidirectional LSTM Language Model for Code Evaluation and Repair. Symmetry, 13(2): 247. [Google Scholar]
  9. Marzieh Ahmadzadeh, Dave Elliman, and Colin Higgins. 2005. An Analysis of Patterns of Debugging Among Novice Computer Science Students. SIGCSE Bull. 37, 3 (June 2005), 84–88. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sue C Fitzgerald, Gary Lewandowski, Renée Mccauley, Laurie Murphy, Beth Simon, Lynda Thomas, and Carol Zander. 2008. Debugging: finding, fixing and flailing, a multi-institutional study of novice debuggers. Computer Science Education, June 2008, 93–16. [Google Scholar]
  11. Michael McCracken, Vicki Almstrum, Danny Diaz, Mark Guzdial, Dianne Hagan, Yifat Ben-David Kolikant, Cary Laxer, Lynda Thomas, Ian Utting, and Tadeusz Wilusz. 2001. A Multinational, Multiinstitutional Study of Assessment of Programming Skills of First-year CS Students. SIGCSE Bull. 33, 4 (Dec. 2001), 125–180. [Google Scholar]
  12. James C. Spohrer and Elliot Soloway. 1986. Novice Mistakes: Are the Folk Wisdoms Correct? Commun. ACM 29, 7 (July 1986), 624–632. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yutaka Watanobe. Aizu online judge. https://onlinejudge.u-aizu.ac.jp. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  14. Davin McCall and Michael Kölling. 2014. Meaningful categorisation of novice programmer errors. In the Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Madrid, 2014, pp. 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  15. Maria Hristova, Ananya Misra, Megan Rutter, and Rebecca Mercuri. 2003. Identifying and Correcting Java Programming Errors for Introductory Computer Science Students. SIGCSE Bull. 35, 1 (Jan. 2003), 153–156. [Google Scholar]
  16. Amjad Altadmri and Neil C.C. Brown. 2015. 37 Million Compilations: Investigating Novice Programming Mistakes in Large-Scale Student Data. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 522–527. [Google Scholar]
  17. Md.Mostafizer Rahman and Yutaka Watanobe. 2019. An efficient approach for selecting initial centroid and outlier detection of data clustering. In Advancing Technology Industrialization Through Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Vol. 318, 616–628. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.