EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 157 (2023) SHS Web Conf., 157 (2023) 04001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 157, 2023
2022 International Conference on Educational Science and Social Culture (ESSC 2022)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 5
Section Human Behavioural Science and Social Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315704001
Published online 13 February 2023
  1. Hattie, J. (2009). The Black Box of Tertiary Assessment: An Impending Revolution. Higher Education, 19. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., Simão, A. M. V., & Barros, A. (2016). Effectiveness and relevance of feedback in Higher Education: A study of undergraduate students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 49, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. [Google Scholar]
  4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785384 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314564881 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu, Q.-K., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2022). A review of AWE feedback: Types, learning outcomes, and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2033787 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feeney, E. J. (2007). Quality Feedback: The Essential Ingredient for Teacher Success. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 80(4), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.80.4.191-198 [Google Scholar]
  10. Van der Kleij, F., Adie, L., & Cumming, J. (2017). Using video technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12536 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795 [Google Scholar]
  13. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090 [Google Scholar]
  14. Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  15. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. van der Kleij, F. M. (2019). Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.010 [Google Scholar]
  17. Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., & Montanero, M. (2018). Oral presentations in higher education: A comparison of the impact of peer and teacher feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1303032 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467125 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Evans, C. (2013). Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350 [Google Scholar]
  20. Rowe, A. D., & Wood, L. N. (2008). Student perceptions and preferences for feedback. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332 [Google Scholar]
  22. Davey, G., De Lian, C., & Higgins, L. (2007). The university entrance examination system in China. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701625761 [Google Scholar]
  23. Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.