Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 190, 2024
2024 International Conference on Educational Development and Social Sciences (EDSS 2024)
Article Number 01018
Number of page(s) 5
Section Teaching Practice and Educational Development Reform
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419001018
Published online 18 April 2024
  1. Lu, F.. (2015). Current opportunities and challenges of professional education in architecture in China. Western Journal of Habitat (06), 28-31. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fan Wenbing. (2015). Dilemmas and opportunities of architecture in today’s university research system - Reflections and explorations from the perspective of architecture education. Journal of Architecture (08), 99-105. [Google Scholar]
  3. G. A D. Historical development of CIPP as a curriculum evaluation model[J]. History of Education, 2023, 52(1):109–128. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jiang, G. Y.. (2007). The theory and practice of CIPP- based higher education evaluation. China Higher Education Research (08), 10-12. [Google Scholar]
  5. Xiao Yuanjun. (2003). An analysis of CIPP education evaluation model. Educational Science (03), 42-45. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hou Fei. (2013). Research on teaching and construction of university architecture laboratory under constructivist teaching concept (Master’s thesis, Shenyang University of Architecture) 67(2). [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang Jinyi. (2005). A brief analysis of CIPP course evaluation model. Vocational and Technical Education (10), 38-39. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, Shan. (2022). Research on the Civic Science Evaluation Mechanism of Higher Vocational Courses Based on CIPP Evaluation Model. Journal of Zhengzhou Railway Vocational Technology College (04), 84-87. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shen, Qingqing, Feng, Jianghua & Zhu, Baosheng. (2022). Construction and monitoring of CIPP evaluation model of teaching quality of dual innovation under the concept of “three circles and three whole ten education”: an example of two higher vocational institutions in Shanghai. Vocational Technology (06), 21-27. [Google Scholar]
  10. Aslan M., Uygun N. Evaluation of Preschool Curriculum by Stufflebeam’s Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model[J]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Fengli. (2022). Research on the curriculum system of outdoor sports camps in elementary school based on CIPP evaluation model (Master’s thesis, Chengdu Institute of Physical Education). [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen Huisi [C]//Institute of Management Science and Industrial Engineering. Proceedings of 2018 International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. Dou Quaneng. (2021). Research on practical teaching evaluation index system of preschool education based on CIPP evaluation model. Journal of Shaanxi Preschool Teachers College (11), 23-29. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, Yachuan & Sun, Qiangqiang. (2019). Research on the index system of preschool education based on CIPP evaluation model. Comparative Education Research (05), 98-105. Wang, Xiaojie, Song, Naiqing & Zhang, Feiyi. (2020). Research on the index system of labor education measurement in primary schools-- an exploration based on the CIPP evaluation model. Educational Research and Experimentation (06), 61- 68. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhu Zhaolin. (2018). Research on training evaluation model:A dynamic type of circular circle based on CIPP. Henan Social Science (04), 121-124. [Google Scholar]
  16. Huo Liyan, Sun Qiangqiang & Hu Hengbo. (2019). A theoretical conception and applicability examination of the index system of preschool education in China. Educational Research (02), 50-61. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen Chen & Song Peisen. (2019). Construction of CIPP evaluation model for higher education open courses. Knowledge Economy (18), 119-120. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.