EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 191 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 191 (2024) 14009 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 14009
Number of page(s) 15
Section Syntaxe
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419114009
Published online 28 June 2024
  1. Alexiadou, A. (2014), The problem with internally caused change-of-state verbs. Linguistics 52(4): 879–909. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou E. & Schäfer F. (2006), The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation: 175–199. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou E. & Schäfer F. (2015), External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexiadou, A., & Schäfer F. (2006), Instrument subjects are agents or causers. In Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 40–48. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Barque, L., Haas P., Huyghe R., Tribout D., Candito M., Crabbé B. & Segonne V. (2020), FrSemCor: Annotating a French corpus with supersenses. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Frédéric Béchet, Philippe Blache, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Hitoshi Isahara, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Hélène Mazo, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: 5912–5918. [Google Scholar]
  6. de Benito Moreno, C. (2022), The middle voice and connected constructions in Ibero-Romance: A variationist and dialectal account. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bentley, D. (2023), Internally caused change as change by inner predisposition: Comparative evidence from Romance. Journal of Linguistics First view: 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonami, O. & Thuilier J. (2019), A statistical approach to affix rivalry: French -iser and -ifier. Word Structure 12: 4–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cassarà, A. & Stein A. (2023), Salience and structural priming of verb argument structure. Présentation à Deutscher Romanistentag, Leipzig, 25.09.2023. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dubois, J. & Dubois-Charlier F. (1997, Les verbes français. Paris: Larousse. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fausey, C. M., Long B.-L., Inamori A. & Boroditsky L.(2010), Constructing agency: The role of language. Frontiers in Psychology 1. 162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fausey, C. M. & Boroditsky L. (2011), Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18(1): 150–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fellbaum, C. & Zribi-Hertz A. (1989), La construction moyenne en français et en anglais: étude de syntaxe et de sémantique comparées. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 18: 19–57. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardani, F., Rainer F., Luschützky H C. (2019), Competition in morphology: A historical outline. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler, & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation, Dordrecht: Springer: 3–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Härtl, H. (2003), Conceptual and grammatical characteristics of argument alternations: The case of decausative verbs. Linguistics 41(5): 883–916. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Haspelmath, M. (1993), More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity: 87–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Haspelmath, M., Calude A., Spagnol M., Narrog H. & Bamyacı E. (2014), Coding causal–noncausal verb alternations: A form-frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50: 587–625. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heidinger, S. (2010), French anticausatives: A diachronic perspective. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Heidinger, S. (2015), Causalness and the encoding of the causative-anticausative alternation in French and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics 51: 562–594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heidinger, S. (2019), Reflexive and unmarked anticausatives in French and Spanish: Frequency of transitive use and undergoer overlap. Langages 216: 53–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heidinger, S. & Huyghe R. (2024), Semantic roles and the causative-anticausative alternation: evidence from French change-of-state verbs. Linguistics 62(1): 159–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Horvath, J. & Siloni T. (2011), Causatives across components. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(3): 657–704. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huyghe, R & Varvara R. (2023), Affix rivalry: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Word Structure, 16(1): 1–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jakubíček, M., Kilgariff A., Kovář V., Rychlý P. & Suchomel V. (2013), The TenTen corpus family. In 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL 2013: 125–127. Lancaster: Lancaster University. [Google Scholar]
  25. Junker, M.-O. (1987), Transitive, intransitive and reflexive uses of de-adjectival verbs in French. In David Birdsong & Jean-Pierre Montreuil (eds.), Advances in Romance linguistics: Linguistic symposium on Romance languages 1986: University of Texas at Austin: 189–199. Dordrecht: Foris. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kailuweit, R. (2012), Construcciones anticausativas: El español comparado con el francés. In Valeriano Bellosta von Colbe & Marco García García (eds.), Aspectualidad-transitividad-referencialidad: Las lenguas románicas en contraste: 133–158. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  27. Labelle, M. & Doron E. (2010), Anticausative derivations (and other valency alternations) in French. Probus 22(2): 303–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav M. (1995), Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Levin, B. & Rappaport Hovav M. (2005), Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lignon, S. (2013), -iser and -ifier suffixation in French: Verify data to ‘verize’ hypotheses? In Nabil Hathout, Fabio Montermini & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Morphology in Toulouse: Selected proceedings of Décembrettes 7 (Toulouse, 2–3 December 2010): 109–132. Munich: Lincom Europa. [Google Scholar]
  31. Malchukov, A. (2015), Valency classes and alternations: Parameters of variation. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages: Introducing the framework, and case studies from Africa and Eurasia, vol. 1: 73–130. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin,F. (2023), The Syntax of Causatives in the Romance Languages. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin, F., Nie Y., Silleresi S., Dal Farra C., Alexiadou A. & Guasti M.-T. (2023), Agent bias in child Italian event descriptions. Talk at LSA 2023. January 5–8, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mazziotta, N. & Martin F. (2013), An exploratory approach to transitivizing affixes in French. In Thomas Wielfaert, Kris Heylen & Dirk Speelman (eds.), Proceedings of Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics 5, 12–14 September 2013, University of Leuven: 54–58. Leuven: KU Leuven. [Google Scholar]
  35. McKoon, G. & Macfarland T. (2000), Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language 76(4): 833–858. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Muentener, P. & Lakusta L. (2011), The intention-to-CAUSE bias: Evidence from children’s causal language. Cognition 119(3): 341–355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Namer, F. (2013), Adjectival bases of French -aliser and -ariser verbs: Syncretism or under-specification? In Nabil Hathout, Fabio Montermini & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Morphology in Toulouse: Selected proceedings of Décembrettes 7 (Toulouse, 2–3 December 2010):185–210. Munich: Lincom Europa. [Google Scholar]
  38. Piñón, C. (2001), A finer look at the causative-inchoative alternation. In Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XI, 346–364. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. [Google Scholar]
  39. Reinhart, T. (2002), The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3): 229–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Roger, C. (2003), De la pertinence de la notion de paradigme pour les procédés de construction des verbes de changement d’état. In Bernard Fradin, Georgette Dal, Nabil Hathout, Françoise Kerleroux, Marc Plénat & Michel Roché (eds.), Silexicales 3: Les unités morphologiques: 179–187. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. [Google Scholar]
  41. Samardžić, T. & Merlo P. (2012), The meaning of lexical causatives in cross-linguistic variation. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 7(12): 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  42. Samardžić, T. & Merlo P. (2018), The probability of external causation: An empirical account of crosslinguistic variation in lexical causatives. Linguistics 56(5): 895–938. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schäfer, F. (2008), The syntax of (anti-)causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schäfer, F. (2009), The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2): 641–681. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Silleresi, S.., Dal Farra C, Nie Y., Martin F., Guasti M.-T.& Alexiadou A. (2022), The agent bias holds in production too: Event descriptions in child Italian. Paper presented at BUCLD 47, Boston, November: 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vietri, S. (2023), Causalness and the encoding of the causative/anticausative alternation in Italian psych verbs: Extending Heidinger’s corpus research of French and Spanish change-of-state verbs. Annali di Ca’ Foscari – Serie Occidentale 57: 57–86. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vivanco, M. (2016), Causatividad y cambio de estado en español: la alternancia causativo-inacusativa. Thèse de doctorat, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. [Google Scholar]
  48. Willems, D. (1979), Syntaxe, morphosyntaxe et sémantique. Les verbes dérivés. Cahiers de Lexicologie 35: 3–25. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wolff, P. (2003), Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events. Cognition 88(1): 1–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wolff, P., Jeon G.-H. & Li Y. (2009), Causers in English, Korean, and Chinese and the individuation of events. Language and Cognition 1(2): 167–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wright, S. (2001), Internally caused and externally caused change of state verbs. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Dissertation. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zúñiga, F. & Kittilä S. (2019), Grammatical voice (Cambridge Textbooks in linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.