| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 06010 | |
| Number of page(s) | 12 | |
| Section | Linguistique de l'écrit, linguistique du texte, sémiotique, stylistique | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184606010 | |
| Published online | 09 July 2018 | |
Quelle unité pour l’argumentation ? La concession, entre cellule et séquence argumentative
Universités de Neuchâtel et de Lausanne
La séquence argumentative de Jean-Michel Adam, inspirée du fameux modèle de Toulmin, peine à intégrer en son sein les concessions. Il est proposé ici de donner les contours d’une unité argumentative plus stable et plus flexible, la cellule, qui tiendrait compte des concessions et de voir comment cette unité permet de s’assembler à d’autres pour créer une séquence argumentative complexe.
Abstract
Which textual unit is suitable for dealing with argumentation?. Integrating concessive moves into Stephen Toulmin’s layout of argument or Jean-Michel Adam’s argumentative sequence is quite a challenge. This article aims to define a more flexible and stable argumentative unity: the argumentative cell - and attempts to study how cells combine to form a complete argumentative sequence.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.