EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 46 (2018) SHS Web Conf., 46 (2018) 10013 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 10013
Number of page(s) 15
Section Psycholinguistique et acquisition
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184610013
Published online 09 July 2018
  1. Aitken, K.G. (1977). Using Cloze Procedure as an Overall Language Proficiency Test. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 11, n°1, pp. 59-67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen, R. (1984). What’s gender good for, anyway?. Second Language: a crosslinguistic perspective. Rowley, Ma. : Newbury House, pp. 77-99. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andriamamonjy, P. (2000). Le rôle du genre grammatical au cours de la reconnaissance des noms. L’année psychologique, vol. 100, n°33, pp. 419-442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnon, I., et Ramscar, M. (2012). Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition, vol. 122, n°3, pp. 292-305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartning, I. (2000). Gender agreement in L2 French: Preadvanced vs. advanced learners. Studia Linguistica, vol. 54, n° 2, pp. 225–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergen, J. J. (1978). A simplified approach for teaching the gender of Spanish nouns. Hispania, vol. 61, n° 4, pp. 865-876. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bull, W. (1965). Spanish for teachers: Applied Linguistics. New York: The Ronald Press Co. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carroll, S. (1989). Second-Language Acquisition and the Computational Paradigm. Language Learning, vol. 39, n° 4, pp. 535-594. [Google Scholar]
  9. Clegg, J.H. (2011). A Frequency-based Analysis of the Norms for Spanish Noun Gender. Hispania, vol. 94, n° 2., pp. 303-319. [Google Scholar]
  10. Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Desrochers, A., Paivio, A., et Desrochers, S. (1989). L’effet de la fréquence d’usage des noms inanimés et de la valeur prédictive de leur terminaison sur l’identification de genre grammatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, vol. 43, n° 1, pp. 62-73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dewaele, J.-M., et Véronique, D. (2001). Gender assignment and gender agreement in advanced French interlanguage: a cross-sectional study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 4, n° 3, pp. 275-297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Field, A. (2014). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
  14. Finnemann, M. D. (1992). Learning agreement in the noun phrase: the strategies of three first-year Spanish students. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, vol. 30, n° 2, pp. 121-136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Franceschina, F. (2001). Grammatical gender in native and non-native Spanish grammars. Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics, vol. 3, pp. 1-19. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gass, S., Mackey, A., et Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-Based Interactions in the Classroom and Laboratory Settings. Language Learning, vol. 55, n° 4, pp. 575-611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Granfeldt, J. (2005). The Development of Gender Attribution and Gender Agreement in French: A Comparison of Bilingual First and Second Language Learners. Focus on French as a Foreign Language: Multidisciplinary Approaches. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 164-189. [Google Scholar]
  18. Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C. & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem?. Second Language Research, vol. 28, n° 2, pp. 191-215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guillard-chamart, G. (2009). Un ou Une ? Règles internes du genre des noms en français. Paris : Edilivre. [Google Scholar]
  20. Harley, B. (2013). Les distinctions de genre. La langue en jeu dans les classes communicatives de français langue seconde (fascicule 3). Toronto : Institut d’études pédagogiques de l’Ontario. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hawkins, R. & Chan, Y.C. (1997). The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The Failed Features Hypothesis. Second Language Research, vol. 13, pp. 187-226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Holmes, V. & Dejean de la batie, B. (1999). Assignment of grammatical gender by native speakers and foreign learners of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, vol. 20, n° 4, pp. 479-506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoeppner, W. (1980). Derivative Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache und ihre algorithmische Analyse. Tübingen: Niemeyer. [Google Scholar]
  24. Housen, A. (2002). Second language achievement in the European School system of multilingual education. Education and Society in Plurilingual Contexts. Bruxelles: VUBPress, pp. 96-128. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jeanmaire, G. (2010). Vox populi vox Dei ? L’identification du genre grammatical en français. Langue française, vol. 4, n° 168, pp. 71-86. [Google Scholar]
  26. Karmiloff-smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Klassen, R. (2016). The representation of asymmetric grammatical gender systems in the bilingual mental lexicon. Probus, vol. 28, n° 1, pp. 9-28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Köpcke, K.-M. (1982). Untersuchungen zum Genusssytem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Küpisch, T., Akpinar, D., et Stöhr, A. (2013). Gender assignment and gender agreement in adult bilinguals and second language learners of French. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, vol. 3, n°2, pp. 150-179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A Guide to Doing Statistics Using SPSS in Second Language Research Using SPSS. New-York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lyster, R. (2006). Predictability in French gender attribution: a corpus analysis. French Language Studies, vol. 16, n° 1, pp. 69-92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mills, A. (1986). The Acquisition of Gender: A Study of English and German. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you?. New York: Dial Books for Young Readers. [Google Scholar]
  35. Morales, L., Paolieri, D., Dussias, P.E., et Valdés Kroff, J.R. (2016). The gender congruency effect during bilingual spoken-word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 19, n°2, pp. 294-310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Osterhout, L., Mclaughlin, J., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., et Molinaro, N. (2006). Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A Means for Exploring the Neurocognition of Second Language Processing. Language Learning: A journal of Research in Language Studies, vol. 56, n° suppl. 1, pp. 199-230. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pérez-Pereira, M. (1991). The acquisition of gender. What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language, vol. 18, n°3, pp. 571-590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Prodeau, M. (2005). Gender and number in French L2: can we find out more about the constraints on production in L2?. Focus on French as a Foreign Language: multidisciplinary approaches. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sabourin, L., Stowe, L.A., et de Haan, G.J. (2006). Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, vol. 22, n° 1, pp. 1-29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Salamoura, A., et Williams, N. (2007). The representation of grammatical gender in the bilingual lexicon: Evidence from Greek and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, vol. 10, n° 3, pp. 257-275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schoonjans, E., Schoonheere, E., Welcomme, A., et Janssens S. (2009). Second Language Learning and the External Context: A Comparative Study of Four Authentic Instructional Contexts. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, vol. 81, pp. 9-19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Skehan, P., et Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, vol. 1, n° 3, pp. 185-211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Slobin, D. I. (2004). The Many Ways to Search for a Frog: Linguistic Typology and the Expression of Motion Events. Relating Events in Narratives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 219-257. [Google Scholar]
  44. Surrdige, M. (1993). Gender assignment in French: The hierarchy of rules and the chronology of acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 31, n° 2, pp. 77-95. [Google Scholar]
  45. Surridge, M. (1995). Le ou La? The Gender of French Nouns. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar]
  46. Swain, M., Lapkin, S., et Barik, H. (1976). The Cloze Test as a means of Second Language Proficiency for Young Children. Working Papers in Bilingualism, vol. 11, pp. 32-42. [Google Scholar]
  47. Taylor, W. (1953). Cloze Procedure: A New Tool for Measuring Readability. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 30, n°4, pp. 415-433. [Google Scholar]
  48. Teschner R. V., et Russell W. M. (1984). The gender patterns of Spanish nouns: an inverse dictionary-based analysis. Hispanic Linguistics, vol. 1, n° 1, pp. 115-132. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tipurita, M-E., et Jean, G. (2014). Enseignement explicite du genre des noms en français : expérimentation au primaire en classe d’immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, vol. 70, n° 3, pp. 279-302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Science, vol. 4, n° 5, pp. 156–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tucker, G.R., Lambert W.E., et Rigault, A.A. (1977). The French Speaker’s Skill with Grammatical Gender: An Example of Rule-Governed Behavior. The Hague : Mouton. [Google Scholar]
  52. Violi, P. (1987). Les origines du genre grammatical. Langages, n° 85, pp. 15-34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.