EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 46 (2018) SHS Web Conf., 46 (2018) 10012 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 10012
Number of page(s) 15
Section Psycholinguistique et acquisition
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184610012
Published online 09 July 2018
  1. Allard, D. (2008). Connaissances lexicales et en morphologie dérivationnelle chez des apprenants adultes avancés en français langue seconde. Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal. [Google Scholar]
  2. Antidote 9 [Logiciel]. (2017). Montréal, Druide informatique. [Google Scholar]
  3. Apel, K. (2014). A Comprehensive Definition of Morphological Awareness. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(3), 197-209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Apel, K., Diehm, E., & Apel, L. (2013). Using Multiple Measures of Morphological Awareness to Assess its Relation to Reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 33(1), 42-56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arbuckle, J. L. (2017). Amos (Version 24.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS. [Google Scholar]
  6. Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berthiaume, R., Besse, A.-S., & Daigle, D. (2010). L'évaluation de la conscience morphologique: proposition d'une typologie des tâches. Language Awareness, 19(3), 153-170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloomfield, Leonard. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt. [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. Hillsdale: NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  10. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carlisle, J.F. et Nomanbhoy, D.M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177-195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 428-449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: a longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Casalis, S., Mathiot, E., Bécavin, A-S., et Colé, P. (2003). Conscience morphologique chez des apprentis lecteurs tout-venant et en difficultés. In : Fradin B. et al. (dir.), Silexicales n°3, « Les unités morphologiques », Actes du 3e Forum de morphologie de Villeneuve d’Ascq, 19-21 septembre 2002, 57-66. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row. [Google Scholar]
  17. Colé, P., Royer, C., Leuwers, C., & Casalis, S. (2004). Les connaissances morphologiques dérivationnelles et l'apprentissage de la lecture chez l'apprenti-lecteur français du CP au CE2. L'année psychologique, 104(4), 701-750. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2008). A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexics and poor readers: A strength of weakness? Learning, Cognition and Dyslexia. 192-211. [Google Scholar]
  19. Desrochers, A., Kirby, J. R., Thompson, G. L., & Fréchette, S. (2009). Le rôle de la conscience phonologique dans l’apprentissage de la lecture. Revue du Nouvel-Ontario,(34), 59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duncan, L.G., Casalis, S. et Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(3), 405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Foucambert, D., & Bourdages, R., (2017). Logix© (version 1.0) [Logiciel informatique], Montréal. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gombert, J. É. (1990). Le développement métalinguistique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gombert, J. É., Gaux, C., & Demont, E. (1994). Capacités métalinguistiques et lecture : quels liens ? Repères, 9, 61-73. [Google Scholar]
  24. Green, L., D., McCutchen, C., Schwiebert, T., Quinlan, A., Eva-Wood, A., & Juelis, J. (2003). Morphological development in children’s writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 452–761. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis, Toronto : Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Howell, D. C. (2008). Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines, 2e édition (D. Boeck Ed.). [Google Scholar]
  27. Kieffer, M.J., Petscher, Y., Proctor, C.P. & Silverman, R.D. (2016). Is the Whole Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts? Modeling the Contributions of Language Comprehension Skills to Reading Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1-19. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuo, L.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological Awareness and Learning to Read: A Cross-Language Perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161-180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Le Petit Robert. Dictionnaire alphabétique et analogique de la langue française, nouvelle édition millésime 2013, Paris, Dictionnaires Le Robert, « Dictionnaire des suffixes du français le Robert », accessible au http://robert-illustre.lerobert.com/pdf/dictionnaire-des-suffixes.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  30. Manolitsis, G., Grigorakis, I., & Georgiou, G. K. (2017). The Longitudinal Contribution of Early Morphological Awareness Skills to Reading Fluency and Comprehension in Greek. Frontiers in Psychology, 1-32. [Google Scholar]
  31. Muse, A. E. (2005). The nature of morphological knowledge. Florida State University, Tallahassee. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of Morphology Beyond Phonology to Literacy Outcomes of Upper Elementary and Middle-School Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 134-147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Reder, F., Marec-Breton, N., Gombert, J. E., & Demont, E. (2013). Second-language learners' advantage in metalinguistic awareness: a question of languages' characteristics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 686-702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Riegel, R. Pellat, J-C., Rioul, R. (2004). Grammaire méthodique du français. Payot. [Google Scholar]
  35. Roy, C. et Labelle, M. (2007). Connaissance de la morphologie dérivationnelle chez les francophones et non-francophones de 6 à 8 ans. Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 263-291. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rubin, H. (1988). Morphological Knowledge and Early Writing Ability. Language and Speech, 31(4), 337-355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Spencer, M., Muse, A., Wagner, R. K., Foorman, B., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Tighe, Elizabeth L. & Bishop, M. D. (2015). Examining the underlying dimensions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge. Reading and Writing, 28(7), 959-988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tibi, S., & Kirby, J. R. (2017). Morphological awareness: Construct and predictive validity in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5), 1019-1043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tighe, E. L., & Binder, K. S. (2015). An investigation of morphological awareness and processing in adults with low literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 245-273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2015). Exploring the Dimensionality of Morphological Awareness and Its Relations to Vocabulary Knowledge in Adult Basic Education Students. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 293-311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2016). Modeling the Relations Among Morphological Awareness Dimensions, Vocabulary Knowledge, and Reading Comprehension in Adult Basic Education Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 649–667. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.