Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 78, 2020
7e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 01025
Number of page(s) 15
Section Discours, pragmatique et interaction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207801025
Published online 04 September 2020
  1. Amerine R., Bilmes, J. (1988). Following Instructions. Human Studies, 11, 327-339. [Google Scholar]
  2. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. (Ed.), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 366-405. [Google Scholar]
  3. Depperman, A. (2012). How does ‘cognition’ matter to the analysis of talk-in- interaction?. Language Sciences 34, 746-767. [Google Scholar]
  4. Depperman, A. (2018a). Instruction practices in German driving lessons: Differential uses of declaratives and imperatives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28 (2), 265-282 [Google Scholar]
  5. Depperman, A. (2018b.) Inferential Practices in Social Interaction: A Conversation- Analytic Account. Open Linguistics 4, 35-55. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dynel, M. (2016). With or without intentions: Accountability and (un)intentional humour in film talk. Journal of Pragmatics 95, 67-78. [Google Scholar]
  7. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s Program. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar]
  8. Garner, S. B. (2018). Movement, Attention, and Intentionality. Kinesthetic Spectatorship in the Theatre: Phenomenology, Cognition, Movement, 09-144. [Google Scholar]
  9. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1),1-54. [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodwin, M. H., Goodwin, C. (1992). Assessments and the Construction of Context. In: Duranti A., Goodwin C., (Eds). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147-90. [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodwin, M. H., Goodwin, C. (2004). Participation. In: A. Duranti (Ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 222-244. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hazel, S. (2018). Discovering Interactional Authenticity: Tracking Theatre Practitioners Across Rehearsals. In: Pekarek Doehler S., Wagner J. and Gonzalez-Martinez E. (Eds.), Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 255-283. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jolivet Pignon, R. (2015). La représentation rhapsodique - Quand la scène invente le texte, L’Entretemps, coll. « Champs théâtral ». [Google Scholar]
  15. Kantor, T. ([1977] 2004). Le théâtre de la mort. Textes réunis et présentés par Denis Bablet. Paris: L’Age d’Homme. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lefebvre, A. (2018). Reading and embodying the script during the theatrical rehearsal. Language and Dialogue 8 (2), 261-288. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lyon, E. (1982). Stages of Theatrical Rehearsal. Journal of Popular Culture 16 (2), 7589. [Google Scholar]
  18. McAuley, G. (1998). Towards an Ethnography of Rehearsal. New Theatre Quaterly 14 (53), 75-84. [Google Scholar]
  19. McAuley, G. (2012). Not magic but work. An ethnographic account of a rehearsal process. Manchester: Manchester University Press. [Google Scholar]
  20. Meisner, S. (1987). On Acting. New York: Random House. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mondada, L. (2009). The Embodied and Negotiated Production of Assessments in Instructed Actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (4), 329-361. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mondada, L. (2014). Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies 16 (2), 131-161. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1), 85-106. [Google Scholar]
  24. Norrthon, S. (2019). To stage an overlap - The longitudinal, collaborative and embodied process of staging eight lines in a professional theatre rehearsal process. Journal of Pragmatics 142, 171-184. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pavis, P. (2014). Dictionnaire de la performance et du théâtre contemporain. Paris: Armand Colin, coll. « Dictionnaire ». [Google Scholar]
  26. Piazza, R. (1999). Dramatic discourse approached from a conversational analysis perspective: Catherine Hayes’s Skirmishes and other contemporary plays. Journal of Pragmatics 31, 1001-1023. [Google Scholar]
  27. Proust, S. (2004). Le corps du metteur en scène. Demeter 3, 1-11. [Google Scholar]
  28. Reason, M. (2015). Participation: Researching the ‘active’ theatre audience. Participations - Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 12 (1), 271-280. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rossen-Knill, D., Henry, R. (1997). The pragmatic of verbal parody. Journal of Pragmatics 27 (6), 719-752. [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmidt, A. (2018). Projections and preparations within theatrical rehearsals. In: Depperman A., Streeck J. (Eds.), Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 231260. [Google Scholar]
  31. Selting, M. (2010). Affectivity in Conversational Storytelling: An Analysis of Displays of Anger or Indignation in Complaint Stories. Pragmatics 20, 229-277. [Google Scholar]
  32. Simmel, G. (2001). La philosophie du comédien, Paris: Circé. [Google Scholar]
  33. Stanislavski, C. (2003[1936]). An actor prepares. New York & London: Taylor and Francis Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  34. Stucky, N. (1988). Unnatural acts: Performing natural conversation. Literature in Performance 8 (2), 28-39. [Google Scholar]
  35. Stucky, N., (1993). Toward an aesthetics of natural performance. Text and Performance Quarterly 13 (2), 168-180. [Google Scholar]
  36. Stucky, N. (1994). Interactional silence: Pauses in dramatic performance. Journal of Pragmatics 21, 171-190. [Google Scholar]
  37. Verdier, M. (2019). La contextualisation: un problème étique? CORELA, en ligne: https://journals.openedition.org/corela/7613. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.