Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 113, 2021
International Scientific and Practical Conference “Professionalism of a Teacher: Psychological and Pedagogical Support for a Successful Career” (ICTP 2021)
Article Number 00043
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111300043
Published online 25 June 2021
  1. A.V. Kondrashova, Forms of interaction of school and university under modern conditions, International research journal, 09(63), 146–149 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Barak, Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism, Research in Science Education, 47, 283–303 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu.I. Shcherbakov, Interaction between the university and the school in modern conditions, World of Science, culture, education, 1(44), 105–107 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. O.S. Sadomtseva, L.A. Dzhigola, V.V. Shakirova, Propedeutics of chemical knowledge in primary and secondary school students, Physics in school, S2, 186–189 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Trust, N. Woodruff, M. Checrallah et al., Educators’ interests, prior knowledge and questions regarding augmented reality, virtual reality and 3D printing and modeling, TechTrends (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Gabel, Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: a look to the future, Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 548–554 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Ford, T. Minshall, Invited review article: where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education, Additive Manufacturing, 25, 131–150 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Kostakis, V. Niaros, C. Giotitsas, Open source 3D printing as a means of learning: An educational experiment in two high schools in Greece, Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 118–128 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. M.J. Song, Learning to teach 3D printing in schools: how do teachers in Korea prepare to integrate 3D printing technology into classrooms?, Educational Media International, 55(3), 183–198 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Brown, 3D printing in instructional settings: identifying a curricular hierarchy of activities, TechTrends, 59, 16–24 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Bower, M. Stevenson, A. Forbes et al., Makerspaces pedagogy – supports and constraints during 3D design and 3D printing activities in primary schools, Educational Media International, 57(1), 1–28 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. E.G. Gordeev, V.P. Ananikov, Widely accessible 3D printing technologies in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmaceutics: applications, materials and prospects, Russian Chemical Reviews, 89(12), 1507–1561 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. C.W. Pinger, M.K. Geiger, D.M. Spence, Applications of 3D-printing for improving chemistry education, Journal of Chemical Education, 1, 112–117 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. B.C. Gross, J.L. Erkal, S.Y. Lockwood et al., Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on Biotechnology and the chemical sciences, Analytical Chemistry, 86(7), 3240–3253 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. N.L. Dean, C. Ewan, J.S. McIndoe, Applying hand-held 3D printing technology to the teaching of VSEPR theory, Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1660–1662 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Da Veiga Beltrame, J. Tyrwhitt-Drake, I. Roy et al., 3D Printing of Biomolecular Models for Research and Pedagogy, Journal of visualized experiments, 121, 55427–55435 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. I. Verner, A. Merksamer, Digital design and 3D printing in technology teacher education, Procedia CIRP, 36, 182–186 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Marchak, I. Shvarts-Serebro, R. Blonder, Crafting molecular geometries: implications of neuro-pedagogy for teaching chemical content, Journal of Chemical Education, 3, 43–47 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Renner, A. Griesbeck, Think and print: 3D printing of chemical experiments, Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3683–3689 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Fourches, J. Feducia, Student-guided three-dimensional printing activity in large lecture courses: A practical guideline, Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 291–295 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  21. J.D. Herron, S.C. Nurrenbern, Chemistry education research: improving chemistry learning, Journal of Chemical Education, 76(10), 1354–1361 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Huleihil, 3D printing technology as innovative tool for math and geometry teaching applications, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 164(1), 12023–12030 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  23. G.M. Battle, G.M. Ferrence, F.H. Allen, Applications of the cambridge structural database in chemical education, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 43, 1208–1223 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  24. G.M. Battle, F.H. Allen, G.M. Ferrence, Teaching 3D structural chemistry using crystal structure databases: 1. An interactive web-accessible teaching subset of the Cambridge Structural Database, Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 809–812 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  25. G.M. Battle, F.H. Allen, G.M. Ferrence, Teaching 3D structural chemistry using crystal structure databases: 2. Example teaching units that utilise an interactive web-accessible subset of the Cambridge Structural Database, Journal of Chemical Education, 87, 813–818 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  26. J.P. Stewart, Stewart Computational Chemistry (2016) [Google Scholar]
  27. A.V. Savchenkov, Designing Three-Dimensional Models That Can Be Printed on Demand and Used with Students to Facilitate Teaching Molecular Structure, Symmetry, and Related Topics, Journal of Chemical Education, 97(6), 1682–1687 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  28. P.J. Paukstelis, MolPrint3D: Enhanced 3D Printing of Ball-and-Stick Molecular Models, Journal of Chemical Education, 95(1), 169–172 (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.