Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 143, 2022
Colloque international « Enseigner et apprendre l’orthographe à l’heure du numérique » (ONEA)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 5
Section Activité de l’élève et processus d’apprentissage
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214301001
Published online 04 August 2022
  1. Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C. et Ros, C. (2006). Eye and Pen: a new device to study the reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38(2), 287–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alamargot, D., Flouret, L., Larocque, D., Caporossi, G., Pontart, V., Paduraru, C., Morrisset, P. et Fayol, M. (2015). Successful written subject verb agreement: an online analysis of the procedure used by students in Grades 3, 5 and 12. Reading and Writing. 28(3), 291–312. doi: 10.1007/s11145-014-9525-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bock, J. K. et Cutting, J. C. (1992). Regulating mental energy: performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 99–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bock, J. K. et Eberhard, K. M. (1993). Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(1), 57–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bock, J. K. et Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chesnet, D. et Alamargot, D. (2005). L’Analyse en temps réel des activités oculaires et grapho-motrices du scripteur : intérêt du dispositif « Eye and Pen ». L’année Psychologique, 105(3), 477–520. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fayol, M. et Jaffré, J.-P. (2008). Orthographier. Paris : PUF. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fayol, M., Hupet, M. et Largy, P. (1999). The acquisition of subject-verb agreement in written French: From novices to experts’ errors. Reading and Writing, 11, 153–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fayol, M. et Got, C. (1991). Automatisme et contrôle dans la production écrite : les erreurs d’accord sujet-verbe chez l’enfant et l’adulte. L’année psychologique, 91(2), 187–205 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fayol, M., Largy, P. et Lemaire, P. (1994). When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 437-464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Largy, P. et Fayol, M. (2001). Oral cues improve subject-verb agreement in written French. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 121–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hupet, M., Schelstraete, M. A., Damaeght, N. et Fayol, M. (1996). Les erreurs d’accord sujet-verbe en production écrite. L’année psychologique, 96, 587–610. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hupet, M., Fayol, M. et Schelstraete, M-A. (1998). Effects of semantic variables on the subject-verb agreement processes in writing. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 59–75. [Google Scholar]
  14. Totereau, C., Barrouillet, P. et Fayol, M. (1998). Overgeneralizations of number inflections in the learning of written French: The case of nouns and verbs. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 447–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.