EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 157 (2023) SHS Web Conf., 157 (2023) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 157, 2023
2022 International Conference on Educational Science and Social Culture (ESSC 2022)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 5
Section Distance Education Training and Educational Innovation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315702001
Published online 13 February 2023
  1. G.C. Burdea, P. Coiffet. Virtual Reality Technology. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 12, 663–664 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  2. M.A. Soliman, A. Pesyridis, D. Dalaymani-Zad, M.G. Gronfula, M. Kourmpetis. The Application of Virtual Reality in Engineering Education. Applied Sciences 11(6), 2879 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Dettori. Critical perspectives on technology and education Palgrave Macmillan. S. Bulfin, et al. ed (2015). British Journal of Educational Technology 47(1), E3 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Ott, L. Freina. A Literature Review On Immersive Virtual Reality In Education: State Of The Art And Perspectives (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Wirth, et al. A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences. Media Psychology 9, 493–525 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Gynnild, D. Myrhaug, B. Pettersen. Introducing innovative approaches to learning in fluid mechanics: a case study. European Journal of Engineering Education 32, 503–516 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Ancelin-Bourguignon. The priming role of qualitative research in constructivist management control teaching. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management (2019). [Google Scholar]
  8. Z.C. Zacharia, T. de Jong. The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits of Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum. Cognition and Instruction 32, 101–158 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Halabi. Immersive virtual reality to enforce teaching in engineering education. Multimedia Tools and Applications 79, 2987–3004 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Montalvo-Lopez, et al. Development of a Virtual Reality Environment Based on the CoAP Protocol for Teaching Pneumatic Systems. AVR 2021: Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics, 528–543 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Wang, et al. A Critical Review of the Use of Virtual Reality in Construction Engineering Education and Training. International journal of environmental research and public health 15(6), 1204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Makarova, et al. The application of virtual reality technologies in engineering education for the automotive industry. 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 536–544 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Salah, et al. Virtual Reality-Based Engineering Education to Enhance Manufacturing Sustainability in Industry 4.0. Sustainability 11(5), 1477 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Horváth. Innovative engineering education in the cooperative VR environment. 2016 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 359–364 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. S.M. Cobb, R. Heaney, O. Corcoran, S.K. Henderson-Begg. The Learning Gains and Student Perceptions of a Second Life Virtual Lab. Bioscience Education 13, 1–9 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. W. Alhalabi. Virtual reality systems enhance students’ achievements in engineering education. Behaviour & Information Technology 35(11), 919–925 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Dunnagan, et al. Production and Evaluation of a Realistic Immersive Virtual Reality Organic Chemistry Laboratory Experience: Infrared Spectroscopy. Journal of Chemical Education 97(1), 258–262 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Makransky, N.K. Andreasen, S. Baceviciute, R.E. Mayer. Immersive virtual reality increases liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology (2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.